User talk:Damianobrigo
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit] Hello, Damianobrigo. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Damiano Brigo, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Edits triggered by previous flag on inline citations and secondary sources
[edit]Hi Demiurge1000, you kindly added a flag on the wikipedia page on myself I just updated, the flag signalling issues with neutrality. If you kindly look at the talk page you will see that the original page had many inaccuracies and I cut it down considerably. I merely edited it after a number of years to comply with standards. Can we remove this flag? The latest edit that triggered your flag is due to the inline citations I added to comply with the previous flag. In fact let me add here that I am not sure about this page, as I say in the page talk area, but if it has to be there at least I would like it to be accurate. Thanks Damiano (talk) 18:29, 23 September 2014 (GMT)
Damianobrigo, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Damianobrigo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC) |