User talk:Dalitidlamadur
Dalitidlamadur, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Dalitidlamadur! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Dalitidlamadur. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Dalitidlamadur. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Baldur Bett
[edit]Hi. I encourage you to follow WP:BRD when you are reverted and also use WP:EDITSUMMARIES to explain your edits. Thank you. GiantSnowman 20:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Use of timestamps
[edit]By the way, while we're discussing timestamps: your changing of the timestamp in Friðjónsson's "International" section to an older one goes against long-established WP:FOOTY consensus which fellow editor "FkpCascais" refers to in this discussion:
"This issue has been setled long time ago. It was decided the timestamp would indicate that the stats are correct as to the date, rather than indicating the date of the last game. Once this was decided, updating a timestamp with correct stats is allways beneficial. Having an old timestamp is unproductive as it leaves readers wandering if stats may have changed by now."
Robby.is.on (talk) 14:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you! It's good to be corrected :) Dalitidlamadur (talk) 14:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 14:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Youth career
[edit]Because that is how we have always displayed it. GiantSnowman 16:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- That's not even an argument. This is usually linear, but have exceptions to the rule even been discussed? What does "that is how we have always displayed it" refer to? A rule, a discussion, a personal preference? Dalitidlamadur (talk) 16:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- GS is correct, it represented consensus at WP:FOOTY until very recently. There's an ongoing discussion on the question, feel free to add to it: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football&oldid=980859163#RfC_on_youth_career_in_infobox Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 23:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)