User talk:Daliaxer

Welcome!

Hello, Daliaxer, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Daliaxer, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Elene13 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Elene13. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daliaxer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Editing from the same country is not a reason to block an editor at large. Millions of editors would be working from same geographical space. Also, although I joined Wikipedia community recently, I had been working on Draft:Bo Shao article since a year and you can review my knowledge of Wikipedia through the neutrality of the draft and sources used. Linking it with someone else's biographical page is absolute unjust. It appears like a collateral damage for all involved accounts just because they belong from same country. However, its my first block and I acknowledge that: · I have read and understood the WP:SOCK guidelines and any activities that give any impression of sockpuppetry will be avoided.

· I have read and understood the WP:MEAT guidelines and any activities that give any impression of meatpuppetry will be avoided.

· I have read and understood the Questions and Answers regarding WP:SOCK and will take help from these pages in future. @Bbb23: Daliaxer (talk) 17:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is too much fishy about this situation for me to get into, but I think most basically that there is no benefit to this project in unblocking you. 331dot (talk) 21:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daliaxer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Exactly, neither i am gonna get benefitted by this project nor this project is gonna get benefitted upon my account's unblock. I believe in bias decisions and clearly seems like some authority holding users are involved in protection of this HOR page and blocking anyone, everyone nominating its deletion. Last i checked Wikipedia promotes, neutral, authentic, non-bias information but unfortunately it hasn't been happening lately. Anyways, I request the unblocking of my account and i will clearly abide by Wikipedia policies and guidelines as I was earlier. @Bbb23: @331dot: Daliaxer (talk) 3:45 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Blaming others while not addressing your behavior that led to the block. Nice!-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daliaxer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise for this behavior and as i said, i will be making sure to comply with Wikipedia policies. I am not blaming anyone but seriously i couldn't understand why that page is still live even after a few admins have voted for deletion. Anyways, not my concern anymore. I request you to kindly unblock my account so if I am misunderstood in some way, I could rectify that situation and demonstrate it through my contributions for this platform. Believe me, I love editing on Wikipedia and working on some categories for their improvement. I won't disappoint again. Please let me know what i would need to do once I am unblocked. Thanks and I appreciate you admins for reviewing my requests. @Deepfriedokra @Bbb23 --- Daliaxer (talk) 12:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nothing here convinces me it would be beneficial to Wikipedia to lift this block. Yamla (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How else can i convince you that i will be solely focusing on the benefits of Wikipedia and nothing else? I can share a few publications I have on ResearchGate just to demonstrate my research skills. Is there anything else I can do to get this block lifted? @Yamla@Deepfriedokra --- Daliaxer (talk) 14:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I converted the above from an unblock request. Unblock requests are not for conversations.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sent you an email, kindly check.::@Bbb23 --- Daliaxer (talk) 15:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bo Shao (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bo Shao and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 18:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bo Shao

Hello, Daliaxer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bo Shao, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]