User talk:Dafyd/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Dafyd. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
|
|
WikiProject Musical Theatre wants your help! You are listed as either an active or an inactive participant of WikiProject Musical Theatre. This project has been dormant for a while, but we are very close to reaching consensus on several of the project's main documents (see the talk page for details). Once we get that business and formality out of the way, we are all free to attack the musical theatre articles of Wikipedia and have a wonderful Musical Theatre party! We want you to be a part of that!
So, come and join us! Add your input to the last few business items and then let's get this party started!
|
Your Page Edit
Thought I'd help you clean it up. I don't know why I felt compelled to do it. Must be OCD. -- 69.133.80.66 (talk)
No problem haha. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Eh. What can one do? At least I wasn't gay and just vandalized. -- 69.133.80.66 (talk) 22:30, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Evita
It looks to me like you deleted a lot of information from the musical today. Can you explain why? Thanks! -- Ssilvers 01:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I did, and if you take a look at the talk page, it's there. I was trying to work out a way to fit it (the Historical Credentials bit) into the article structure. It was one o'clock in the morning, and I needed sleep - so I was going to finish it now. Make sense? - Dafyd 10:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, thanks! Sorry I jumped the gun. I've done a copy edit on the section now. Hope it helps! -- Ssilvers 14:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Theatre infobox
Hey -- I just noticed that you left a message over at WP London regarding a theatre infobox. I know you're a member of WPMT, but I'm not sure if you've noticed the proposal in our template sandbox. Its something I've wanted to implement for awhile, and would love some feedback on it. — MusicMaker5376 04:26, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
WPMT Roll Call and COTM
You're receiving this message because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Musical Theatre. Please post at the talk page to let us know if you're still with the project. Feel free to post on the talk page about what musical theatre-related work you're doing or to weigh in on the current discussions on the talk page.
Nominations for our Collaboration of the Month are currently being accepted. What should we focus on for the month of November? Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Wicked
Thanks for the support. I was surprised that there weren't immediate howls of protest from fans of Psych, Arrested Development or The War at Home - I mean for heaven's sake!! Some of those seen/mentioned examples really were utter drivel!! I'm going to make something more of the West End production, since that and Broadway are the two traditional homes of theater, and then I'm going GAC, PR, LOCE and then FAC. So stick around as I'm sure this article is going places! Happy‑melon 22:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hehe - this amuses me - I presume you're not aware that the contents of those templates is almost exactly the same as the wikitable code you replaced!! Of course it doesn't make any difference whatsoever, I just found it funny! On another note, I wanted to say thanks and good work on formatting all those references - even if I do feel guilty that I didn't really do my fair share. The four remaining fact tags won't last long, leaving only the lead section and the synopsis as obstructions to an unprecedentedly quick GA renomination. Given that I completely redid the synopsis and the GA reviewer was completely unimpressed, do you want to have a go at the plot, and I'll redo the lead? Happy‑melon 22:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Fix (musical).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Fix (musical).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Wicked (musical) FAC
Hi there. I just nominated Wicked (musical) for FAC. I think it does have a reasonable chance of passing, and if it fails consider it a peer review with a lot of comments :D. However, apparently making more than one FAC nomination at once is discouraged. So I wondered, as you're one of the most important contributors to this article, if you wanted to nominate it and I'll go down as conominator. You can view the nomination at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wicked (musical). Happy‑melon 22:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info on the designers. I moved it down to the production section, though, because it is about the production team for the original production. Is the info for Broadway, or did the same designers do the San Fran tryout? -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you! :’) --Yamanbaiia(free hugs!) 14:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
From the editor — From the editor: A new weekly feature
|
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Wicked
Don't be discouraged that the musical did not pass the FA review on the first try. The article has come a long way, and I think that now it is pretty close to FA quality in most of its sections. I suggest that you review the comments made at the peer review and the FA review. Sandy Georgia is one of the best article analyists on Wikipedia, and she and Raul basically decide which articles are promoted to FA. So, see if you can do anything further along the lines suggested in the peer review, especially the image issues that she has mentioned. You need a real image expert to come in and make sure the images are Kosher. Then, nominate the article again. This time, I think you may achieve the support you need, but the image issues raised by Sandy must be dealt with first. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
From the editor — From the editor: New feature
|
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks from Happy-melon
I just wanted to say thanks for your support for my RfA, which closed (74/2/0) this morning. Your comment and support was very much appreciated. I'm sure I'll see you around on Wicked (musical) or elsewhere - hopefully we can try another FAC in the not-too-distant future. Happy‑melon 15:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 7 | 11 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 8 | 18 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
From the editor — From the editor
|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 9 | 25 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 10 | 3 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
Wales' relationship with journalist
Wales' relationship, breakup with journalist Rachel Marsden raises questions about possible improprieties |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Wicked (musical)
Hi! I'm having trouble keeping fancruft, etc. off the Wicked (musical) article. Can you please watch it too? Thanks! Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 11 | 13 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
From the editor — From the editor
|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 12 | 17 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
yes, yes i know. i just discovered the problem and it's being rectified. cheers. --emerson7 14:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 13 | 24 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)