User talk:Dachidles
- Hi @Hieutrung19,
- In the page Human rights in Vietnam, there is an infamous user called @Milktaco, who vandalised the article of this talk page, also wrote two sections called “Repression of Chams,” and “Ethnic Minorities” in the Human Rights in Vietnam page. It’s been there since 2014.
- Evidence of Milktaco writing them:
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Human_rights_in_Vietnam&diff=prev&oldid=612402516
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Human_rights_in_Vietnam&diff=next&oldid=612402516
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Human_rights_in_Vietnam&diff=next&oldid=612402612
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Human_rights_in_Vietnam&diff=next&oldid=624221294
- I cannot access the page unfortunately; I hope you could please help by removing Milktaco’s vandalism from the Human Rights in Vietnam page. Just tag it as "Removed vandalism from sock puppet Milktaco" It's the "Repression of Chams" and "Ethnic Minorities" sections. The title “Rights of specific groups” should be removed too, because after you remove the vandalised sections, it won’t be necessary to have that pluralised title anymore.
- Sorry to bother you - and thank you!
Dachidles (talk) 17:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Belugajdm per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belugajdm. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. DatGuyTalkContribs 22:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.