User talk:Dabby12

April 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Spin the bottle, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jeh (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Hello Dabby12,

Your recent edit to The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild has been reverted, because there were several issues with it. If you believe the edit was valid, discuss it on my, or The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild's talk page. If you need a space to work on an article, you can use the sandbox. If you need help writing, editing, reviewing or doing anything to a video games article, contact me on my talk page and I'd be glad to help.

I can see that the edit was made in good faith, but there were several problems with it.

First off all, the information you applied to the article doesn't belong in the lead section, it belongs in Reception, in which that topic is already covered. Secondly, the information you supplied had no source. Also, there were a lot of errors regarding English in the work. A proofread before clicking Save changes is always beneficial.

I can see that you are a relatively new user -- do not be disheartened! If you **ever** need help writing anything, hit me up on my talk page. Everyone here at Wikipedia appreciates all contributions.

Manfred (talk) 13:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dabby12, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dabby12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Masterchef Religion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Masterchef Religion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 03:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Reddogsix. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 02:13, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Adcock moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michael Adcock, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Your addition to User:Dabby12 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DMacks (talk) 06:51, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Dabby12. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Eman 235/talk 03:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dabby12! You created a thread called Typos at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Gympie, you may be blocked from editing. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 23:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. El_C 03:56, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 04:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Michael Adcock concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Michael Adcock, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:21, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dabby12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, I feel that this blockage was made unfairly. I was not aware that what i was doing was vandalism. I need to do some edits and if i ever vandalise ever again, as god as my witness, you may delete my profile and lay down on me with the fist of ld mama glory. I need to edit some things as part of a school assignment and if I am unable to edit those things, I would recieve an F and my parents would most likely ban me from using the computer! Please please please unblock me!!

Decline reason:

If you weren't aware that what you were doing was vandalism, then you lack the skills and maturity needed to be able to participate here. You may take this experience as a life lesson that actions have consequences. To be unblocked, you will need to describe exactly what edits you want to make and provide assurance that you won't engage in further vandalism. You don't need to swear to God, just explain that you know what you did was wrong. 331dot (talk) 07:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Then what would you call your edits to Xi Jingping? CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]