User talk:DaFazzle
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
A tag has been placed on Aussie-nintendo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. If you plan to provide more notable material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:Aussie-nintendo. An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such material. Bubba hotep 10:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
April 2007
[edit]
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Bentleigh Secondary College. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want. CalebNoble 08:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Total Gamer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattinbgn/ talk 20:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Lemmy's Land
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lemmy's Land, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lemmy's Land is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lemmy's Land, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of songs on Minutes to Midnight
[edit]
List of songs on Minutes to Midnight, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of songs on Minutes to Midnight satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs on Minutes to Midnight and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of songs on Minutes to Midnight during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ArglebargleIV 07:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Chicken Park"
[edit]A page you created, Chicken Park, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:
- Test pages.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you —αἰτίας •discussion• 06:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Chicken Park
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chicken Park, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Chicken Park. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 06:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Chicken Park
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Chicken Park, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken Park. Thank you. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 03:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Jake Harper
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Jake Harper, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page.
Proposed deletion of Scylla (Prison Break)
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scylla (Prison Break), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- No real world notability. It's a plot device of a tv series features only in some episodes of season 4. The subject is covered satisfyingly in episode articles and in The Company (Prison Break).
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Scylla (Prison Break)
[edit]I have nominated Scylla (Prison Break), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scylla (Prison Break) (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Magioladitis (talk) 10:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Ways to improve Just Stupid!
[edit]Thanks for creating Just Stupid!.
A New Page Patroller Domdeparis just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:
It is debatable that the award meets criteria #2 of WP:NBOOK. The other criteria are not shown to be met please add more sources or this will possibly be a candidate for deletion.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Dom from Paris (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Penitenciaría Federal de Sona for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penitenciaría Federal de Sona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penitenciaría Federal de Sona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – sgeureka t•c 18:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Just Disgusting! for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Disgusting! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
VickKiang (talk) 10:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Just Stupid! for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Stupid! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.