User talk:D M WELL

September 2015

Hello, I'm General Ization. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on King Bach, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! General Ization ^Talk 03:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page CutiePieMarzia has been reverted.
Your edit here to CutiePieMarzia was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/user/CutiePieMarzia/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to King Bach. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 17:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Gigi Gorgeous. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 17:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Khloe Kardashian at the Fashion Police Premiere.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Khloe Kardashian at the Fashion Police Premiere.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Denniss (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Erakat at the 2015 Streamy Awards.png

A tag has been placed on File:Erakat at the 2015 Streamy Awards.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Denniss (talk) 21:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

Please help me with... deleting my Khloe Kardashian & Yousef Erakat files!

D M WELL (talk) 21:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello D M Wells. If you are asking for these two images (File:Erakat at the 2015 Streamy Awards.png and File:Khloe Kardashian at the Fashion Police Premiere.jpg) be deleted at your request, then I can help. Please confirm that is what you are asking for.--Mojo Hand (talk) 22:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Yousef Erakat. Yamaguchi先生 22:45, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:05, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]