User talk:DWL901
February 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Air New Zealand Flight 901, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. XLerate (talk) 05:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Air New Zealand Flight 901. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. XLerate (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Air New Zealand Flight 901, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bidgee (talk) 08:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Air New Zealand Flight 901. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Bidgee (talk) 08:47, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
