User talk:DNTST

:3

USERNAME

Hi your user name suggest that you are the person in this article DNTST. this is either in violation of WP:REALNAME if it is not you or if it is you then this is an WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY and strongly discouraged especially as it seems like a WP:SOAPBOX article. Please read WP:USERNAME for more info. Domdeparis (talk) 13:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DNTST for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DNTST is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNTST until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I apologize to inform you that it is the latter. I thought the global fan base & accumulation of over 22 million plays was enough to warrant a wikipedia page, but I suppose I shouldn't have made that decision myself! Before making the frame, I scouted out some of my favorite artists, and I followed the information they'd listed. I'd assumed that since all the information was sourced from reputable blogs, the article would be more or less unbiased, though I suppose that's not the case if I've put the information there myself! Feel free to do as you see fit with the article. I'll be scouting out WP:SOAPBOX & WP:USERNAME for more info. Happy new year!

Sincerely, DNTST (talk) 15:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DNTST no problem whatsoever! Thanks for your reply and for understanding my concerns and not taking offense (so many people do!!) I sincerely hope that someday soon there will be enough coverage to enable an article to be created. Just so you're clear about my remarks I am not in any way suggesting that views were bought and I am assuming good faith (which you have clearly shown) I was just pointing out that number of views cannot in themselves be considered as being a valid criteria for notability. Criteria for inclusion in wikipedia is quite stringent, if you are curious have a look at WP:GNG which explains this quite well. The trouble is that there is nearly half the world's population that has access to internet and we are all worthy of recognition and note but Wikipedia has to fix certain levels of notability to keep the encyclopedic nature of the project. i would love for someone one day to believe that I have done enough to merit my own page but as you so rightly said in the deletion discussion I'll let it handle itself organically!

Anyway if you decide to stay here as an editor I wish you happy editing, it can be very addictive! cheers Domdeparis (talk) 15:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:DNTST

A tag has been placed on User:DNTST requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 14:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DNTST Logo (Smiling tooth- Black background white outline) (2017).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DNTST Logo (Smiling tooth- Black background white outline) (2017).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DNTST Logo (Smiling tooth- Black background white outline) (2017).jpeg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:DNTST Logo (Smiling tooth- Black background white outline) (2017).jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from as specified by the uploader. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cabayi (talk) 22:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]