User talk:DJ SG Gayashan

November 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Martin Garrix has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.

DJ SG Gayashan|(t)]] ANN scored at 0.943709 on 2015-11-25T02:19:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SG Gayashan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SG Gayashan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 (talk) 06:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at SG Gayashan. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 06:06, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SG Gayashan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SG Gayashan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kolbasz (talk) 09:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SG Gayashan

The article SG Gayashan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:42, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SG Gayashan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SG Gayashan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Datbubblegumdoe^{[talk – contribs]} 04:09, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from SG Gayashan, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Datbubblegumdoe^{[talk – contribs]} 04:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Alex Gilbert (TV Presenter). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 04:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You risk getting blocked

You risk getting blocked. I appreciate your help on the article. But you are edit warring with other users and that could get you blocked. Please discuss on the talk page instead.--Misconceptions2 (talk) 17:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions on all pages regarding Muhammad

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Muhammad, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— MusikAnimal ^talk 16:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring in the List of expeditions of Muhammad article

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --CounterTime (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He is right. But this is an example of the pot calling the kettle black. Your also engaged in an edit war. DJ SG Gayashan please discuss issued in the talk page. It will be more helpful. --Misconceptions2 (talk) 14:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Misconceptions2: I didn't revert his last edit, and which edit war are you talking about when I simply "went back" to a CONSENSUS that was reached on 26 February 2016‎ (see talk: section: Multiple Issues), before the advent of Misconceptions2 in 14 March 2016‎ who started this revert war.

By the way, instead of stalking my contributions, address the multiple issues outlined in the talk, e.g. here https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:List_of_expeditions_of_Muhammad#Responding_to_CounterTime.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29_about_.2371_Expedition_of_Abu_Qatadah_ibn_Rab.27i_al-Ansari_.28Batn_Edam.29

here https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:List_of_expeditions_of_Muhammad#One_of_CounterTimes_reason_for_deletion_and_why_he_is_unhappy_with_article

and here https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:List_of_expeditions_of_Muhammad#Comments

14:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)CounterTime (talk)

March 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]