User talk:DEFCON5/Archives/2021/November
This is an archive of past discussions about User:DEFCON5. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
removal from deletion discussion Anup Shukla
--45.112.40.4 (talk) 05:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Anup_Shukla Please remove it from the deletion discussion, this article exists since 2013 and edited by so many verified users please check[1]
References
A dedicated user-group.
I hope you are well and good. I've started a Wikimedia user group that is currently running through recognition application. The group is supposed to improve the WMF projects with knowledge around the Deoband seminary at a broader scope, institutions, people, university - that find a distant touch with it. I remember you writing about Zakaullah Dehlvi - a student of famous Mamluk Ali Nanautawi, a prominent scholar within the Deoband school. I invite you to the group, and if you find yourself interested, please add your name in the members list. Have a look here. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 47
Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021
- On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
- Search tool deployed
- New My Library design improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Sock puppet (info only)
Just as a head up, for info purposes. You reverted this edit. To let you know this editor is a self promoting sock puppet that has had at least 5 accounts blocked now from their hoax promotion. Just in case you come across this kind of edit again. You can just revert and let an admin know for blocking if you come across an editor like this. Cheers. Canterbury Tail talk 14:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Regarding Article on particular topic
i want to ask that is AMU Journal notable enough to be created as a separate Article with that number of references, can we work on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamzi9 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Hamzi9: Hi. You can obviously work on a separate article or draft but I personally believe that the subject is not notable enough to pass WP:ORG. Thanks. DEFCON5 (talk) 18:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)