User talk:DDRowiec

Welcome

Hello, DDRowiec, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is DDRowiec's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strachowice, Wrocław (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strachowice, Wrocław and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:56, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! DDRowiec, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 12:56, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strachowice, Wrocław (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still no sources at all

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strachowice, Wrocław and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strachowice, Wrocław (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

still no sources. Do not resubmit without adding sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strachowice, Wrocław and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 03:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strachowice, Wrocław has been accepted

Strachowice, Wrocław, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 15:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Right

Canada seems out.79.56.134.121 (talk) 19:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Janusz Kurczab

Hi. Please note that another language WP page is not a reliable source. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But the sources on this site are reliable! DDRowiec (talk) 19:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the Polish WP page is NOT a reliable source. Please do not re-add text without citing a source. If you continue to do this, it will be viewed as disruption and you could be blocked from editing. Please reply here to state you understand this. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See, that wasn't too hard! You were either being thick or lazy. Or both. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See, this source was on the Polish page. You were either being thick or lazy to read. Or both. And in addition, you have not learned the Polish language. Poorly. DDRowiec (talk) 20:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at K2, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 20:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to K2. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 20:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So you say that the information directly from the participant expedition is not reliable information for wikipedia? Well, you probably know better than Piotr if he is going or not. Ha ha ha DDRowiec (talk) 20:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I say it needs to be verifiable using third party sources. This is an Encyclopedia, stuff needs to be sourced. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 21:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense, 90% of texts have no sources. And wikipedia will NEVER be an encyclopedia. DDRowiec (talk) 21:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then I suggest you find something else to do and leave the editing to people who care, or keep on and get yourself blocked. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 21:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You will not tell me how to live. DDRowiec (talk) 21:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References need to be included with your change, not in a edit summary

Please see Help:Referencing for beginners. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 20:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nanga Parbat. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revol lives and confirmed the entrance. Also their liaison officer. There is no confirmation requirement to enter through any organization!!! DDRowiec (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at K2. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:20, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 19:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 19:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]