User talk:DA HK

Welcome!

Hello, DA HK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 (📼) 10:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically List of passports, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lok Ma Chau Control Point. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 16:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Stop merging Hong Kong and Chinese control points without discussion. I have put a lot of work into the Hong Kong articles. Citobun (talk) 16:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Citobun, It doesn't make sense to have 2 different pages for the same checkpoint. Many such pages have already been merged between other jurisdictions. Please read WP:MERGE and WP:CONTENTFORKING. The same border crossing cannot have two different articles. DA HK (talk) 16:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They are separate facilities, with different names. Citobun (talk) 16:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Citobun, They are the same checkpoint, please read WP:MERGE and WP:CONTENTFORKING DA HK (talk) 16:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is an incredibly sloppy way of "merging" the articles. The original content is written with the Hong Kong context in mind. The article doesn't even make sense following your "merger" because they are different subjects. Citobun (talk) 16:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss before doing these mass merges! Citobun (talk) 16:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Citobun, discuss before you revert my constructive edits DA HK (talk) 16:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Citobun, for example you can have one article for Kennedy Town station and all details in it. You can't have seperate article for the same topic like Kennedy Town station Exit A or Kennedy Town station Exit B, etc, I hope you now understood WP:MERGE and WP:CONTENTFORKING. One article for the bordewr crossing, with details about the two jurisdictions - their name and transport etc in on e article. Good luck DA HK (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an apt comparison. Kennedy Town station is one facility. Two border facilities, with two operators, two different names, two histories, two countries... are not. Citobun (talk) 16:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Citobun,Then why don't you make Hong Kong International Airport in to Hong Kong International Airport Terminal 1 and Hong Kong International Airport Terminal 2? You can't have multiple articles for the same facility. Each border crossing should have one artcle with information about two jurisdictions sharing it. A border crossing is A BORDER CROSSING, not two to have two pages. A border crossing has a history, not two histories. Look at List of Mexico–United States border crossings, San Ysidro Port of Entry, Malaysia–Singapore border, Johor–Singapore Causeway, Malaysia–Singapore Second Link, etc. PLEASE LOOK CAREFULLY! Good luck. DA HK (talk) 17:06, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Second option here. Shenzhen Bay Port worth to have one article because juxtaposed controls. The other is not so that they should have a pair of articles. Also. Most WP:Merge need a discussion thread. Bold merge are eligible to immediately revert. Matthew hk (talk) 08:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While for terminal 2. Actually it may work to create an article as the old Terminal 2 is a WP:GNG passing shopping mall. It lack real facility and everyone rely on underground train to use terminal 1 facility. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST. Please start WP:MERGE discussion, instead of using "X is situation A , so that Y must follow X to use situation A style of article" type of logic. Matthew hk (talk) 13:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will not re-merge these pages without further discussion and consensus DA HK (talk) 06:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May be late reply. DA HK, your edit in Template:China–Hong Kong border crossings nowhere qualify for a minor edit. Matthew hk (talk) 08:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't my edit there well-grouped and more structured and an enhancement? DA HK (talk) 06:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HKSAR passport cover (biometric).svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HKSAR passport cover (biometric).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]