Welcome!

Hello, DANZIG666! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Levine2112 ^discuss 02:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

The Cartridge Family

Look I know that what you're adding is true, I've seen (and numerous other cuts) myself, but, frustratingly, that isn't enough. A blog and a Google groups post are not in any way reliable sources (see WP:RS and WP:V). It seems ridiculous, but it's the rules here, unless a reliable, respected publisher or website states something then it cannot be included. There's a tonne of stuff I know is true (mainly cultural references) but isn't mentioned anywhere reliable, so I was I could just start a blog to source it, but I can't. As a general rule, unless something has been mentioned by a reliable, respected publisher or website, then it shouldn't be included because it is not notable. Gran² 16:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kinda Country

The article Kinda Country has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources or demonstration of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova³¹⁸ 22:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Dream No.13

I redirected the articles in question as they are comprised entirely of track listings and have no indication of notability. This is in accordance with Wikipedia:NMG#Albums, a guideline that pertains to albums in particular. I did a search to see if there was any indication in a reliable source that the albums would meet the general notability guidelines, and therefore be there was no indication. None of the sources that you added qualify as reliable sources and are not significant coverage. Please do not revert the redirects until you have found something that qualifies as significant coverage in a reliable source that is independent of the album/artist/record production company. You can post it here, or on my talk page first if you wish. I would be happy to help any way I can. --kelapstick (talk) 18:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still none of the sources that you have added are reliable sources ← Read that, and they do not qualify as significant coverage. An example of a reliable sources is a newspaper. An example of a non-reliable source is a CD Sales site. Significant coverage is a review of the album (in a newspaper/magazine), Significant coverage is not a track listing on a sales site, or Yahoo music.--kelapstick (talk) 18:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

www.the7thhouse.com is a reliable source, as it is the authorised official fan site for the band Danzig. I was using the CD sales site and Yahoo music as references to prove the track listing, and to prove that it is indeed an album by the artist in question. I consider Yahoo to be a reliable source. As long as it is proven that the album exists I do not see a problem. Otherwise would be to imply that any album which is not a "pop" record receiving mainstream coverage should not have an article and in effect does not exist. I have checked other Wikipedia pages and there are countless articles for albums that have no sources or references whatsoever, and they have not been redirected back to the artist article. I assume this is due to the Wikipedia contributors who 1) have a knowledge of the relevant artists and 2) have viewed said articles having no reason to challenge them, being that the articles are factual. In any case I have now added an additional independent source that includes a link to press reviews.DANZIG666 (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A fan site is not a reliable source. Period. CD Sales sites are not reliable sources. Period. MySpace blogs are not reliable sources. Period. You can ask any editor here, they will tell you the exact same thing. Nobody is denying that the albums exist, however they do not meet the threshold for inclusion for a stand alone article on Wikipedia, I have linked to the relevent guidelines, which judging by your continued reversal of my edits, you have not read. I am going to link it again, read the general notability guideline and the reliable source guideline. The only thing that may qualify is the allmusic link, however significant coverage is NOT simply a track listing, which is what the allmusic guide is. What link is a press review? Simply adding more sales sites does not mean that they are reliable sources. You are not understanding the concept of Wikipedia here.--kelapstick (talk) 01:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also if other articles are here that don't meet the inclusion criteria, that doesn't mean that all albums should have independent articles, it means we should probably redirect those albums to the artists page too. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS as a deletion/keep argument. It doesn't hold water.--kelapstick (talk) 01:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another comment, if you do have a link to a press review, put it here so I can take a look at it, there is a good chance that it would help the article.--kelapstick (talk) 01:43, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some formatting on the references in those four album articles. You should take a look at Wikipedia:Citation templates to see how they are typically formatted, also there is a neat tool called reftool that makes it quite simple (you activate it under your preferences, gadgets). Based on two of the reviews you brought out (one from Metal Invader and one from Gothic Blend) I have no issues with Bad Dream No. 13 and That's All There Is. If you could find something similar for Kinda Country and The Blood and the Body that would make a huge difference, because right now the only appropriate source is Allmusic, and that is a pretty week one right now since all it has is a track listing. A few notes (as I had mentioned above), you can not use a sales site as a reference, it is considered advertising and is contrary to a few guidelines that we have here, namely WP:SPAM and External Links. Also blogs by the artist are not considered reliable sources as they are not independent. If you have any questions about any of this or need any help with the articles let me know, I am happy to help. --kelapstick (talk) 15:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing up the citations on these pages. On closer inspection the Allmusic link for The Blood and the Body does also feature an album review in addition to the track list, so I imagine that will make the source suitable in this instance. I will see what else I can find for the Kinda Country album.DANZIG666 (talk) 16:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had to fix the URL to Ink 19, but it works now. Good luck with Kinda Country, let me know if you have any questions.--kelapstick (talk) 16:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Sarah Stock & Shantelle Malawski.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Sarah Stock & Shantelle Malawski.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sarah Stocks & Shantelle Malawski.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Sarah Stocks & Shantelle Malawski.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 04:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Steele

Hi, DANZIG666. I noticed your contributions to the Peter Steele article. I think the article is in really good shape. One of the things I've looked for but haven't found is a few good sources about Peter's depression. All Type O Negative fans seem to know this, and I even recall Peter discussing it in some interviews at some point, but I haven't been able to find a good source for that. I think this article is close to achieving Good Article status but this particular fact would definitely need a few citations. You're probably a fan like I was... still sad for me that he's gone. I haven't felt as strong about a musician since Layne Staley died. Jason Quinn (talk) 21:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding those links but I was concerned about "clinical depression" and "psychiatric treatment". Both which I believe are true but since they are strong claims, they need strong sources to back them up. I'm going to keep an eye out until I find something. Jason Quinn (talk) 00:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a source that specifically states "clinical depression". I've also just added a quote from Peter himself taken from an interview in 2007 in which he talks about his depression. DANZIG666 (talk) 00:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thank you. What is your assessment for the article? Do you think it's ready to be assessed for Good Article status? Does anything stand out as missing or incomplete to you? It'd be great if we could get this to Featured Article status, maybe even on the main page. That'd probably impact a lot of people who haven't learned about his death yet. Jason Quinn (talk) 01:49, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is too much missing, perhaps a little more about his early life. I agree with you that the article could be a contender for Good Article status. DANZIG666 (talk) 03:17, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:MarkGormleycover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MarkGormleycover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 21:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Mark Gormley.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Mark Gormley.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. He may not have made a public appearance, but he's not a noted recluse. Hammersoft (talk) 13:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the cite. I missed that. I've restored the image. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I've added this detail to the fair use summary to make it more apparent. DANZIG666 (talk) 15:58, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mark Gormley.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mark Gormley.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 13:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of guests on Tom Green's House Tonight

The article List of guests on Tom Green's House Tonight has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The topic of guests on the internet show Tom Green's House Tonight has no secondary sources. Also fails WP:NOT#DIR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 09:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's never stated in the movie that Foster was laid off.

It's stated that he was "fired" and that he "lost" his job. Believe what you want. --68.45.60.20 (talk) 22:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Samhain mishaps

Hi, the last thing I wanted was to start an edit war with you, so I'll just lay this out as nicely as I can. ASCD gives Danzig credit as the writer only. Not the composer, and there is a difference. While it is the ONLY credit given, and believable, it still doesn't specifically cite the exact words to make this assumption. I've been told that ASCD and AllMusic are reliable sources, but they still don't hold the exact wording I'm looking for. That's why I think we should just assume the other band mates had some credit with some songs. While nowhere does it say that, it seems more than an appropriate assumption to make to me. Surely they had atleast some improvision of their own. Or just give Danzig the writing credits. It may seem like a small detail to pick at, but that's just my style as an editor: nailing every detail down to point. Come to my Talk page for a visit on this matter. WestBounce (talk) 23:28, 22 March 2013 (UTC)WestBounce[reply]

Following your request for more exact wording, I have searched around and have found that on the album credits at AllMusic they do refer to Glenn Danzig as the composer for this album. Please find the link here: http://www.allmusic.com/album/november-coming-fire-mw0000271998/credits. As this credits Glenn Danzig using the specific word "composer" I hope this will be acceptable. DANZIG666 (talk) 02:54, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me, I saw that, but the track listing here: http://www.allmusic.com/album/november-coming-fire-mw0000271998 only has the name under four of them. Why would it just be four? If it's a mistake, don't you think they would have fixed it by now? I cannot help but to think there is something missing here. WestBounce (talk) 04:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)WestBounce[reply]

You could however, edit the Initium and Final Descent articles which Allmusic says he composed all the tracks for except number 8 on Descent which he had collaborated on with Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller. WestBounce (talk) 04:49, 23 March 2013 (UTC)WestBounce[reply]

I've gone ahead and added the writing credits to the Initium and Final Descent articles as suggested. DANZIG666 (talk) 18:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter Steele may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

in-black-peter-steele-inspiration/?trackback=tsmclip |publisher=[[Loudwire]]|date=2014-05-26}}</ref> The band [[Danzig (band)|Danzig]], who include Steele's former bandmate Johnny Kelly, have

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck Biscuits

Twice you've undone my edits concerning Chuck's birthdate. I won't bother correcting it again, but you should be aware of a few things for your own edification. First, I went to high school with Chuck at Bby North. He was not born in B.C., or even in Canada, he was born in California. In fact, I recall his parents moving back there at some point. Second, he was not born in 1965. If he were, he'd have been 12 years old when he joined DOA. Which I hope you can appreciate is ridiculous. Chuck was born in 1963. Third, I provided a solid, irrefutable reference to my edit that shows his birth record indexed in California. Both his brothers are listed there as well. How you could undo the edit without at least checking those is beyond me. Lastly, I'm pretty sure Chuck is laughing his arse off, just like he was when that Greene character made the same mistake you are. Subsequent to that fiasco I sent Greene the facts, which he had no problem correcting. At least he understands what a source is. Anyway, although you're purporting facts that are patently false, at least you're giving Chuck a couple of extra years to work with. Perhaps I'll edit my Wiki article similarly?John.W.H.Thompson (talk) 22:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise if the source I gave is incorrect. Could you give the links to Ken and Bob to somehow show that it is the correct Charles Montgomery? I will happily revert back to your version myself.DANZIG666 (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No apology necessary. I recall Chuck once claiming in an interview that he was 12 when he joined DOA (in early '78), but I was sure he was joking. I guess no one else picked up on that. Here are the index entries for the Montgomery brothers: http://www.californiabirthindex.org/birth/kenneth_v_montgomery_born_1957_6283079 http://www.californiabirthindex.org/birth/robert_c_montgomery_born_1961_7732346 http://www.californiabirthindex.org/birth/charles_k_montgomery_born_1963_8511014

As mentioned previously his parents moved back to L.A. The brothers stayed in Van, but Chuck later moved down and lived with them for a while in the 80s. Further to this age confusion, you might also want to check out the footage of DOA at Stanley Park taken July 1, 1978. It's on YouTube. According to the popular narrative, he would have just turned 13. Har de har.

In a separate vein, I note your article makes no mention of his stint with the Circle Jerks. He played with them for a couple of years. He also appeared with them in the movie, 'Repo Man', and is listed in the credits.John.W.H.Thompson (talk) 08:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DANZIG666. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mark Gormley.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mark Gormley.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MarkGormleycover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MarkGormleycover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Without You.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Without You.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reception in list format

Please reconsider putting album Reception into a list. This information should be presented in Prose, not in list form. "Lists should not be a simple enumeration but to be cited should include prose." - says the WP:MOSALBUM (album style guide). I am referring specifically to Black Laden Crown.

Here is an example of prose-written critical reception, from an article that was deemed a "good article". Hawkins! Alive! At the Village Gate has even an even simple reception. Just as long as it's not in a list format. Thanks.--Jennica✿ / ^talk 04:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DANZIG666. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DANZIG666. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DANZIG666. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]