User talk:D33pState2020

July 2020

The sentence on the Carter Page page is materially incorrect. It must be changed. Similar errors were NOT found by Horowitz.

The sentence on that page is wholly misleading and incorrect. 17 material omissions on 4 warrants vs. 1 material misstatement on 14 FISA warrants.

Banned for accurate editing

7/5/2020

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

D33pState2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You're clearly biased. The FBI report directly refutes and debunks the NY times article and summary on the Carter Page page. How do you block me for fixing it? Did you even glance at the link? My edits were correct. The page is wrong. It needs to be fixed immediately. D33pState2020 (talk) 17:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia uses reliable secondary sources by design - interpretation of primary-sourced court documents is open to abuse and broadly deprecated on Wikipedia. This specific subject has been the object of extensive discussion on the talkpage. You have made no attempt to review talkpage discussion or to participate despite repeated requests to do so. Your username appears to be a strong indication that you're not here to work within Wikipedia rules. Acroterion (talk) 18:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note

According to WP:BLANKING, declined unblock requests may not be moved as long as the block is active. Favonian (talk) 07:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]