User talk:D.Nino

Hello, D.Nino, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! El_C 14:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Paris

Nice job with the climate table on Paris. El_C 10:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perth

The article is as much more about the wider Perth metropolitan area - the website you added is for the central part - of the city - small problem - someone else will probably revert - but then the perth portal uses the city coat of arms - so it is an unresolvable mess of meaning - the article about the larger area and the website and portal pointing to the centre... JarrahTree 14:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JarrahTree, I thought this article is about Perth Metropolitan Region. Rev. if needed ; )

No need - dont forget to learn to WP:SIGN - thanks for your reply JarrahTree 15:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I keep forgetting... D.Nino (talk) 15:34, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perth Metropolitan Region is a technical (legislative) article of how the Government defines the Metropolitan area, while Perth is talking about Metropolitan area itself. Also I'd recommend not adding your website, since you have a COI which you have disclosed (and thank you for doing that) but also the information on the site is unknown and not verified. For Australian articles, we stick with Government sources (eg. BoM) as a reliable source. Bidgee (talk) 21:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bidgee: Hi, sorry for bothering you againn.

Regarding BoM, I couldn't find monthly data for Perth for sea temperature, daylight hours or UV index.

http://www.bom.gov.au/places/wa/perth/

http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/index.shtml

http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_009225.shtml

If I'm not asking too much, plaese point me to this information, and I'd be happy to extract and incorporate data in the article if it's ok with you. D.Nino (talk) 21:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Best site I can find is METOC for sea surface temperatures but unsure of its dataset and when it was last updated. ARPANSA for UV and the sunshine hours is cited on the first chart on the page. Though I would recommend that you cease adding your site, COI policy states that it isn't a good idea and also has WP:RSSELF issues. Bidgee (talk) 00:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

weather-atlas

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Sorry for the delayed response. I've noticed your announcement but couldn't respond earlier due to personal reasons. Yesterday I started to draft an answer, but now, I see that the notice has been migrated to archive and can not be edited, so I presume it would be appropriate to post an explanation here.

"I have no relationship with the company Weather Atlas or user D. Nino..."

I can confirm everything from Mr.Kubaski's statement. Additionally, I can affirm that I have reached and offered help with his effort - after he has clearly dedicated a lot of time to contribute to Wikipedia, by inserting data presented mostly in numerals.

This proposal to aid was (now, obviously) a mistake from my side, it was done unthinkingly, but without any ill-thoughts. There weren't any incentive from our nor from Mr.Kubaski side.

So please clear Mr.Kubaski from this incident.

As for "my sake" argument, I can state the following:

I understand the idea of contributing to Wikipedia, the entire purpose of COI, and legitimate intention that you wanted to bring this subject to the wider community for a review.

..."I assumed that your (Mr.Kubaski's) additions were made in good faith"...

What I do not comprehend is that after reporting that "as a source, weather-atlas seems reasonable," after COI declaration, and without objections nor reverts in years from Wikipedia contributors/admins on other users' or mine usage of weather-atlas.com data for contributing to Wikipedia, my edits are perceived as "ill-faithed."

The last substantial contributions from my side were made months ago, sadly not much time for Wikipedia due to personal matters. All recent edits were enhancing and fixing Mr.Kubaski's references. Perhaps the info on % of total edits and references I have made, and the rough timeline of posting might be of some value (as I have been editing articles in my spare time, in periods with months gaps in between).

Please, inform me - what is the correct procedure on the premise that my additions were not made in good faith - as, at the moment, I feel discouraged from contributing to the Wiki project anymore.

Thank You.

On the other hand, archiving of this thread without any resolution is maybe a self-explanatory answer to this subject, and I am overreacting without a valid reason. :(

D.Nino (talk) 12:26, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Yosemite

I have nominated Yosemite National Park for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 07:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ask for help

I remember that in June this year we talked about the temperature conversion method of water temperature (water and sea water), but when I was preparing to write the module, I found a format error. How to solve it? The original discussion page is on the right. However, since I don't understand Lua language, I may still need your help. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 10:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is written in php.

Sorry, can’t help You with further coding.

But, in your case I’ recommend you to try to fix the issues or generate variations of the code using ChatGPT4. D.Nino (talk) 06:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]