User talk:Cz mike

Image tagging for Image:Dalal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dalal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This image appears to be a grainy and fuzzy scan from an Israeli publication with an Arabic propaganda caption clumsily tacked on at the bottom. Can you give one reason why this image shouldn't be nuked? AnonMoos 00:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at least you cropped the inflammatory word شهدائنا from off the bottom of the image, but unfortunately you did not provide any information about the image's source or copyright status, which means that the image will probably be deleted fairly soon. If you would take the trouble to find out a little bit about the Wikipedia way of doing things, your Wikipedia editing and uploading experience would then consume much less wasted effort on the part of both yourself and others... AnonMoos 07:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dalal Mughrabi

If you don't like the article's current apparent slant, the answer is NOT to change the article so that it slants even more in the opposite direction. A more constructive move would be to discuss what you most object to on the page Talk:Dalal Mughrabi -- AnonMoos 00:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The same goes for Coastal Road massacre... AnonMoos 00:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, the way to accomplish significant lasting changes in these articles is not to turn them into mere propaganda rants, but to discuss your concerns with the current state of these articles in the locations which have been allocated for such discussions -- namely Talk:Dalal Mughrabi and Talk:Coastal Road massacre. Of course, you know what I always say: المتبرجة خير من الإرهابية المنتحرة !! AnonMoos 07:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Coastal Road massacre. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.

You have been blocked for 24 hours for breaking the 3RR. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:21, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dalal2.jpg

Dude, you are not the copyright holder, and you appear to have been lying when you made the assertion that you were the copyright holder. It would be nice if you were able to upload an image without inflammatory words such as الشهيدة embedded in it... AnonMoos 23:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wafa Idris.jpg

You appear to have been lying through your teeth yet again when you added the copyright tag to that image. AnonMoos 23:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Cz mike for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Isarig 03:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Dalal2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Dalal2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 13:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Dalal Al Mughrabi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Dalal Al Mughrabi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 13:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Wafa Idris.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Wafa Idris.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 13:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Khalil Al Wazir (Abu Jihad).jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Khalil Al Wazir (Abu Jihad).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn (talk) 08:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]