User talk:Cynicism addict
Chaotic
[edit]I would like to know what or why there is a problem with having the Chaotic codes listed on wikipedia, this is a very important aspect of the show and a lot of hard work has gone into compiling this list by several people. The lsit has been removed several times. Could you please tell us what the problem is and what needs to be done to fix it. Thanks!
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Collector cliff (talk • contribs) 23:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC).
- I'm actually not sure what you're referring to. Do you have a link? --Cynicism addict 05:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Request
[edit]I am asking past editors of the Karl Rove page to weigh in on a survey. If you can spare a couple of minutes, please visit this page: Talk:Karl Rove/September Survey, read the introduction, and answer the three questions that have been posed. Thank you. paul klenk 09:07, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
Could you please revisit this discussion, read my comments, and please consider changing your vote? - Mgm|(talk) 10:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- You make an excellent point. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Cynicism addict 23:36, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
I am from a very small town (Glennville, GA), please do not delete this page because Marcus is also from this same town and is one of the few notable people from our town. he is a war hero and is honestly being scouted by major record labels. please me what I have to do to keep this page from being deleted.§Supreme2k1 class of 2008
- Once he has been signed by a major record label, you should try creating the page again. Until he has some major exposure, though, he won't be considered notable enough for wikipedia. You should consult WP:MUSIC to see the criteria for inclusion. --Cynicism addict 16:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thanks but he does at least meet #.6 on the criteria. "6. Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability"
Public Forum Debate
[edit]Thanks, but an apology is not necessary -- I guessed that might have been the case. Adrian Sampson 09:43, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Unsigned Complaint
[edit]sorry im just a little kid im 10 years old i just wanted an article on the website i dont understand why evryone hates my page so much
Only 10
[edit]I believe User:70.246.131.89 and User:Imonly10 may be the same person. At the time of this comment User:70.246.131.89 's last edit was at 04:44, November 16, 2005, commenting on being 10 years old, and User:Imonly10 's first at 04:50, November 16, 2005. Special:Contributions/Imonly10 shows that Imonly10 has recently blanked Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fake spanish (since reverted), the article in question created by 70.246.131.89. Both users type mostly in lower case, use little punctuation, and don't sign posts on talk pages.
Might be worth watching, not as a persistant deliberate vandal, but as a 10 year old kid who may not always know better.
Request for RfC Comment
[edit]Having been a past participant in the User:Braaad / User:68.112.201.90 "incident", I was hoping you could take a second and add any input you might have to an RfC I've written at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Braaad. Thanks. McNeight 05:43, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia Project
[edit]Hi, my name is Federico (alias Pain) and I am creating a section for nominating th best user page, I was wondering if you were interested in joining the project.
The project has just started, and we need help to spread the word and ameliorate it.
Wikipedia:Votes_for_best_User_page
Best regards, Federico Pistono ✆ ✍ 00:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
barnstar
[edit]The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
For dedication to improving and expanding Wikipedia. Good job! Sharkface217 02:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC) |
Welcome to VandalProof!
[edit]Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Cynicism addict! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk 22:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)