User talk:Cyberfoxy

Welcome!

Hello, Cyberfoxy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 01:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Hello, Cyberfoxy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Sofia Tereshchenko, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 22:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Hi! No personal interest as you state or any "external relationship". Just biographical notes taken from openly published sources, interviews and fact checks. I'm interested in Tereshchenko family members and history. Absolutely no employer, I'm a freelance. Neither have ever used any advertising. Thank you.

I am taking your statement that you do not have a conflict of interest on good faith for now, but the fact remains that much of the content you have added to the article (as well as that has been in the article previously) is not cited to published sources and a number of the current sources do not meet the standard required here of being independent and secondary. If there are better sources available, you should make them clear, but please do not continue adding poorly sourced and promotional content to the article. Melcous (talk) 03:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate if you stop repeating that some information on this page is "promotional" because you are wrong and you slander my work. If you don't like this page, just please stop deleting my information taken from reliable sources from internet as Ms Tereshchenko interviews and personal pages and open sources of her detailed life and information taken from there.

Otherwise I will be obligated to complain to the Wikipedia safety department and make the page protected. Thank you.

July 2018[edit]

I would appreciate if you stop repeating that some information on this page is "promotional" because you are wrong and you slander my work. If you don't like this page, just please stop deleting my information taken from reliable sources from internet as Ms Tereshchenko interviews and personal pages and open sources of her detailed life and information taken from there. Otherwise I will be obligated to complain to the Wikipedia safety department and make the page protected. Thank you.

You need to slow down and read some of the wikipedia guidelines and policies that have been linked to. For example, all content must be verifiable by reference to reliable, independent, secondary sources and written from a neutral point of view. If you think linked-in and facebook are acceptable sources (they're not - see WP:UGC), and language like "one of the most famous and unique crews" and "She has already been interviewed twice for two biggest media magazine editions" is neutral and not promotional, then you are not ready to be editing here. Melcous (talk) 22:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Do you even understand that there is full of information about her on Google? She is a media icon and internet celebrity. Did you read my answer? I've read her interviews. Please be so kind and pay attention on what contributors explain to you. Just because you have a bias against this woman, doesn't mean you have a right to vandalize MY page! Please, stop.

It is not YOUR page - see WP:OWN. Continuing to revert to the same version which has multiple problems and goes against number policies (see WP:SURNAME just for one more example) can be considered vandalism and can lead to you being banned from editing here. Also, please sign your posts on talk pages. Melcous (talk) 23:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Melcous, I have just reported you for vandalizing my page contributions! Wikipedia sent me that my report has been considered and will be reviewed. Better stop it and please leave. If you don't like something in the article, write it down POLITELY, HERE in thins conversation, in details!!! and DO NOT mass delete anything ever again!!!! Your behavior is provocative. Stop it. I have politely asked you many times to STOP it. You continue harassing me and vandalizing my page! This is outrageous. I am writing a complaint to Wikipedia straightforward, if you don't stop it.

Disruptive editing[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Tereshchenko. Canterbury Tail talk 00:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And in case you don't know what I mean, adding tabloid journalism, lists of event's she has attended, adding protection templates to unprotected pages and unconnected see alsos. Link to Napoleonic War really? Canterbury Tail talk 00:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.