User talk:Cyan22

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Cyan22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mike Christie (talk) 22:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Bonnie J. Dunbar, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 21:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google it. Cyan22 (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Talk:William Addison (chaplain) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 21:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Accidentally deleted it, thank you for correcting my mistake. Cyan22 (talk) 21:02, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:Andy Hobsbawm, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. —Sean Whitton / 14:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Association of Graduate Careers Advisory Services"

A page you created, Association of Graduate Careers Advisory Services, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a club or other organization, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for organizations in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 18:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK?: Scilly naval disaster of 1707

Hi. I've nominated Scilly naval disaster of 1707, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it as you see fit. DYK reviewers have asked for more/better referencing, so please put in more footnotes and references soon if you are interested in getting your article featured on MainPage. Thank you. --PFHLai (talk) 09:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the nomination! Only problem is that I don't really knwo where to go from here, I looked for the said comments underneath "your nomination's entry" but couldn't even find that header. I've been away for a couple of days, does this mean your nomination has become sort of 'dormant'? Kind regards Cyan22 (talk) 21:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it, Cyan22. It's too late now. Thank you for the article, nonetheless. Please be encouraged to self-nominate your next good wikicontribution for DYK. Happy editing. Take care. --PFHLai (talk) 02:14, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Brooch Scillonian.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Brooch Scillonian.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 20:29, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Brooch ScillonianIII.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Brooch ScillonianIII.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 20:29, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tecwyn Roberts

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tecwyn Roberts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jncraton (talk) 00:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tecwyn Roberts

Great job there, my only contributions were in the editing phase; you have done the yeoman's work in researching and corroborating facts. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Addition of unsourced material

With this edit you altered the article text to state that Fleming's ashes were buried in the crypt of St. Paul's Cathedral, however the source doesn't mention "ashes" or "crypt". I'm curious to learn the reason for your edit? If you are planning to alter established (and sourced) article text, could you please cite the reliable sources that you are using as a basis for your edits? Thanks. GFHandel ♬ 21:09, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lewis (Freemasonry)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lewis (Freemasonry) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OlYeller21^Talktome 03:50, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Grinling Gibbons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Acanthus

Henry Somerset, 1st Duke of Beaufort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Acanthus

St Michael and All Angels Church, Badminton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Acanthus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John French, 1st Earl of Ypres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Funeral directors to the Royal Household, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spencer family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GCB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter and Paul Cathedral may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

rest in July 1998. Also buried here was [[Catherine the Great]], Empress of Russia for 34 years. (Of the post-Petrine rulers, only [[Peter II of Russia|Peter II]] and [[Ivan VI of Russia|Ivan VI]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:13, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duke of Beaufort (France), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dukedom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lijssenthoek Military Cemetery

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lijssenthoek Military Cemetery, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.marlesfordww1.co.uk/index.php/cemeteries/lijssenthoek-military-cemetery.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:26, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lijssenthoek Military Cemetery

Hello Cyan22,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lijssenthoek Military Cemetery for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. William2001 (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Structure of Masonic appendant bodies in England and Wales

Greetings Cyan22, and happy Christmas! :-) I ran into an article called Masonic bodies, and when I made some further Google searches about the organization chart of York rite Masonry, I noticed there is a tiny little conflict there with your self-made graph. See, in these two pictures, "Order of Knights Templar" (OKT) is actually above "Order of Knights of Malta (OKM): [1][2].

First, I wanna say that I know a very little about Masonry, but those two pictures would suggest that the order of "OKT" and "OKM" should be vice versa. There is a huge chance though, that my knowledge on the subject is way too insufficient - or that the two images that I provided above would not be that reliable per se - but do you mind taking a look? =P Cheers and Merry Christmas! :-) Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 16:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there again! There's another thing that came up when I was reading about the topic. See, I have a source that states that the Scottish Rite doesn't turn into a Trinitarian Christian one until the 18th, "Rose Croix", degree[3] (the whole version in Finnish). Therefore, labeling the whole Ancient and Accepted Rite (Scottish Rite) as Trinitarian Christian isn't quite exact in my opinion.

Also here[4], "Order of Knights Templar" is above "Order of Knights of Malta". Besides that, "Order of Red Cross of Constantine" is above "Order of Knights Templar", which would suggest that "Order of the Red cross of Constantine" should be placed on the top. =P Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your enquiry. As you rightly observed, the chart on "Structure of Masonic appendant bodies in England and Wales" is in certain aspects different from the organization chart of York Rite Masonry. The most relevant differences between masonic orders in England&Wales and countries that work the York Rite are the positions of "OKT" and "OKM" as well as the position of certain other degrees. Also, the Ancient and Accepted Rite in England&Wales places great emphasis on the 18th degree and will not admit a candidate if he is not able to profess the Trinitarian Christian faith. It is important to keep in mind, however, that the chart ONLY describes the way Masonic appendant bodies are organized in England & Wales. It does not claim to describe the structure in Scotland, Ireland, or indeed anywhere else outside England & Wales. It also does not describe the York Rite. I hope this helps. Best wishes Cyan22 (talk) 19:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see the issue with OKT and OKM now. Thanks for your reply! How about the Ancient and Accepted Rite when it comes to Trinitarian Christian faith? As you said, it places great emphasis in England and Wales on the 18th degree - but aren't the lower degrees open for non-Christians as well? In Finnish masonry the degrees below 18th are. Anyway, in the current graph, the whole Ancient and Accepted Rite is labeled as "Trinitarian Christian", even it appears that the Trinitarian Christian faith is not required until the 18th degree.

Maybe the graph could be modified a bit? =P Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 20:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In England and Wales, the first degree that is actually conferred upon a candidate in the Ancient and Accepted Rite is the 18th. Degrees below are only given as part of the 18th degree ceremony. Hence the Ancient and Accepted Rite in England&Wales will not admit a candidate if he is not able to profess the Trinitarian Christian faith. Cyan22 (talk) 20:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh, that's very curious! I didn't know that in England and Wales the 18th degree is the first degree conferred upon the candidate. That'd explain a lot, thanks! So diverse Freemasonry is indeed...

I just recently read from a source (the one which I've been pertaining to even earlier) that in Sweden, Freemasonry as a whole would require Trinitarian Christian faith, even the Blue Lodge degrees. In other words, an Universal version there wouldn't exist.

Anyway, thanks for your time and answers! :-) Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 21:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of married couples among space travelers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of married couples among space travelers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of married couples among space travelers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Scallop

I read your recently added paragraphs on the article on Scallop regarding St. Augustine and the symbolism of the shell. These additions are welcome, of course, but they require some kind of reference before they can be accepted at face value. Are you familiar with the process of citing your sources? You seem to have a long enough talk page history to indicate that you do, but your userpage is still undeveloped and you made no effort to include any citations here. Please see WP:CITATION if you need guidance on how to do this. Once you have become familiar with the process, please go back and add sources to these two paragraphs. If you do not, they may be deleted as unsourced content. Thank you! KDS4444^Talk 09:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brooch ScillonianIII.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brooch ScillonianIII.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. KDS4444^Talk 09:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brooch Scillonian.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brooch Scillonian.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. KDS4444^Talk 09:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emmett Brown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Von Braun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

L'îlot

Thanks for adding this to the Granathof but do you have a citation? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 12:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's from these sites: http://www.ilotdelaboisselle.com/ & http://www.laboisselleproject.com/fr/ & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc9s3ZMYIec (8:29, 11:19, 18:30) Regards Cyan22 (talk) 08:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cyan22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio notice

Speedy deletion nomination of Cremation Society of Great Britain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cremation Society of Great Britain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.srgw.info/CremSoc/History/HistSocy.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. zzz (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cyan22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Charles de Foucauld, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Daask (talk) 08:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cyan22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cyan22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All Saints Church, Kedleston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burial vault (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Fryatt

Thanks for your additions to the article. Please can you use {{cite web}} for web references instead of bare urls, particularly on GAs and FAs. I've done the necessary at the article for you this time. See HELP:REFBEGIN for more info about referencing. Mjroots (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello. Your recent edit to John Freeman appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 08:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of dukes of Gaeta, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages French Empire and Michel Gaudin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Admirals and Generals from Worcestershire

A tag has been placed on Category:Admirals and Generals from Worcestershire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Refugees ennobled in the United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion

Category:Refugees ennobled in the United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]