User talk:Cwmhiraeth/Family
Some things to think about[edit]
I noticed you are creating the flounder article too. As usual, please beware of putting your own interpretation on things. You can only report precisely and exactly what the authors of the publications observe (but in your own words), you must not "read more into it" than is actually there, because that is WP:OR or WP:Synthesis.
I know I mentioned to you that presumably the octopus is attacked less often when it makes itself closely resemble a flounder (hard bony fish rather than soft yummy octopus), but nowhere in the paper does it say anything like that, so although that might possibly be true in real life, you have no way of knowing if that is the case, so you cannot put that into a Wikipedia article. Invertzoo (talk) 15:35, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- You are right, but the article did give an indication of why the mimicry might benefit the octopus and I have substituted that. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- What did the source say exactly? Please quote it for me here on this talk page and I will see if I agree with how you have paraphrased it. We have to be so careful about trying to say how exactly a behavior might benefit the octopus. You can only report what the sources chose to say; you must not try to interpret what that might mean, or what the implications might be. If you are in any danger of making an interpretation yourself, maybe you should quote them directly. Invertzoo (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- The source said "... that many smaller gape predators that could bite a portion of a soft octopus would mistake the octopus for a larger rigid flatfish, which would be too much of a mouthful."
- OK. What you have now about this is OK, and I apologize for challenging that particular point. Invertzoo (talk) 23:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- The source said "... that many smaller gape predators that could bite a portion of a soft octopus would mistake the octopus for a larger rigid flatfish, which would be too much of a mouthful."
- What did the source say exactly? Please quote it for me here on this talk page and I will see if I agree with how you have paraphrased it. We have to be so careful about trying to say how exactly a behavior might benefit the octopus. You can only report what the sources chose to say; you must not try to interpret what that might mean, or what the implications might be. If you are in any danger of making an interpretation yourself, maybe you should quote them directly. Invertzoo (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Seems OK[edit]
The article seems OK to me now, but I am not a fish expert. You could maybe ask User:Epipelagic if he would look it over for you, since he is good on fishes. Invertzoo (talk) 00:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)