User talk:Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm

Hello, Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 04:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please stop adding the same information about cuttlefish to the article you have created. You have an obvious conflict of interest and therefore should preferably not edit the article at all. In regards to the specific information, there is already a wikipedia article about the fish and those kind of details belong there, not in this article. Continuing to re-add the same information after it has been removed by another editor with a clear explanation, without giving any reasons or engaging in discussion, can be seen as disruptive editing and may lead to being blocked from editing if continued. Melcous (talk) 15:19, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ruud 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm is an algorithm as any other algorithm

Dear Wikipedia's policies, Cuttlefish Optimization Algorithm is a new optimization algorithm as any other optimization algorithm found in wikipedia articles such as Bees Algorithm, Bat Algorithm, Genetic Algorithm and many other algorithm. It is shared as an information to be publicly that any one can benefit from it. It is not about myself or family, friends, clients, employers, or any financial or other relationships. Best regards. Eesa130.193.179.32 (talk) 22:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)