User talk:Curtis Bligh

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Curtis Bligh! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:36, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Drm310 Curtis Bligh (talk) 07:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Excell Metal Spinning Ltd. Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Excell Metal Spinning Ltd. Logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

copyright tag has now been added Curtis Bligh (talk) 08:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Excell Metal Spinning (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Excell Metal Spinning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Curtis Bligh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

({{Ping|Curb Safe Charmer}}), thank you Curb Safe Charmer for reviewing the article I hope will eventually be suitable for submission in Wikipedia. I was wondering if you could provide me with more information on how this article can be improved with regards to the sources. In its current state, are the sources now suitable? If not, which ones?

This information will help me a great deal in better understanding and improving the article, thank you again for your time! Curtis Bligh (talk) 14:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Excell Metal Spinning (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Excell Metal Spinning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Excell Metal Spinning (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Press releases do not help establish notability. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles_for_creation/Acceptance_criteria#Companies_and_other_organizations

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Excell Metal Spinning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Excell Metal Spinning (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Excell Metal Spinning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've always been led to believe that news articles were reliable sources of the events that took place, am I wrong? {{ping | curb safe charmer}} Curtis Bligh (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Excell Metal Spinning, you may be blocked from editing. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer but this isn't promotional or advertising material. What is stated within the article is purely factual and is available in the public domain. The information written about Excell is written in an unbiased way and have been verified with third party sources. Please see definition of promotional or advertising material. What is written is well within the guidelines.

Rather than tell me to stop, please elaborate on your decision making by providing a constructive response in order to improve this article for the benefit of the public Curtis Bligh (talk) 15:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft is not suitable for Wikipedia because it appears to be about a Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill business. You have a clear conflict of interest. Even if the draft is written in an unbiased way, your behaviour is clearly promotional - you appear to be here for the sole purpose of writing about your family business. If that's the case, Wikipedia isn't the place for you. If you want to show that's not the case, please find another topic to write about. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer what you have said there is based on an assumption with no foundation. When comparing entries like Hubspot, it is hard to reason with your comments.

I will happily contribute to Wikipedia on other subjects if that's what it takes. However I was under the notion that by following the guidelines and learning from others to correct my mistakes, articles based on factual evidence could be written. Not be scrutinised with an assuming, biased perspective. It is a wonder then, how anything is published ... Curtis Bligh (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]