User talk:Cupidcobra

Welcome

Hello, Cupidcobra, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!xC | ☎ 11:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image licensing

Hey there

Thanks for uploading the file Image:Rani Mukherjee.jpg. Per the image copyright tags, you are the author of the work and have uploaded it yourself. I would like to request you to clarify - are you the photographer? Or do you hold the original copyright of the image, which you have now released under GFDL? Or did you find the file on a website and then uploaded it?

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image.

Regards,xC | ☎ 11:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sakshi.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Sakshi.jpg, by Xcentaur (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Sakshi.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

clear copyvio - even has name of the site printed across it, from where it was taken

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Sakshi.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fraudulent licenses

Although you claim, for example, to have taken Image:Sakshi.jpg yourself, this is blatantly false. This appears to be a movie screenshot. Any further such fraudulent claims will result in an immediate indefinite block against your account. --Yamla 17:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Sakshi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Sakshi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sakshi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Sakshi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla 18:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Sakshi.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Sakshi.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for removing tags from images, such as from Image:Sakshi.jpg, without providing the mandatory information. You are welcome to resume editing once the block expires, but please ensure you provide accurate information for your images. --Yamla 19:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were caught violating your block by abusively using a sockpuppet account to continue removing tags without providing the mandatory information. Your block has been extended to 48 hours. Any further evidence of this may result in an indefinite ban from editing. --Yamla 01:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need to resolve this

You have been uploading a lot of images to WP, and every single one of them is under a cloud because it appears that you are simply uploading images you found on the internet.

However, you have made claims that you are the actual photographer who took these images.

To resolve this issue, and since you appear to live in India, would you please get in touch with me, and I will be happy to help establish your bonafides.

Note that I am not an admin - I am simply a WP user trying to help. If you would would rather deal with an admin, I encourage you to contact one.

Achitnis 07:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sexism in India

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sexism in India, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Triwbe (talk) 17:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may have created this article, but it is not yours - it belongs to the public. Furthermore, commentary such as "Why are you hijacking my article?" belongs on the Talk:Sexism_in_India page, which can also be found under the "discussion" tab. If you read the discussion, as well as the proposed deletion vote, you will see why your article has been modified, and you will be able to share your views with the other editors. Please note that Wikipedia articles are not a place for personal opinions. See Wikipedia:SOAP#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox and Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view for information on some crucial policies you may not be aware of - you will save yourself and others much frustration in the future. 98.226.245.252 (talk) 06:17, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And some more points in addition to the ones above:

This is not a forum/chatroom or blog. This is an encyclopedia. See WP:NOT.
Wikipedia is not a place for ublication of original thought.
Do not leave messages on the article page. Please do so on the talk page.

I recommend that you read the links in the welcome message above in detail before you make more edits. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 06:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don not blank talk pages

Youy have been warned many times. But let me do it again. You are not allowed to blank talk pages --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 04:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your comments

I again politely request you to read Five pillars. Please go throug the links I ahve provided. It will really be helpful for you. Please be civil in your discussions and respect talk page guidelines. If you talk angrily and get personal , you are violating the spirit of collaboration that has made Wikipedia a success.

About your statement You are not the owner of wikipedia: You are absolutely right about that . No one owns any article on Wikipedia and I am fully aware of that. But have you introspected on your behaviour before advising me?

About this statement: everyone has the right to express his view point; please take note that Wikipedia is not a democracy. Nor is it your webhost.

If you have any compaints you may please report them at the Administrator's Notice Board. Lastly, I am surprised that you have stated that I have a strong bias against men. Why would I have something against my own gender? :-). --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 08:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful to note that Deepak D'Souza is not the only one making edits to Sexism in India - he's not even the one making the most significant changes. I'll leave it to you to investigate the history of the page yourself, but if you do, you might realize that the user who has been "messing" with the page the most has actually championed its existence. Without that user's efforts, it would most likely have been deleted by now. 98.226.245.252 (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why should it matter?

So you have been out there googling my name , trying to find out who i am? Why?--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 07:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I refuse to answer your question. You can reach whatever conclusion you want to. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 06:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 04:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Cupidcobra for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Also, I've already emailed the Arbitration Committee list about my account creation. I am 98.226.245.252, but I needed to create this account to lodge the complaint against you. Murmurer (talk) 09:09, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who is after whom?

In resonse to this comment: [1] why are u guys after me? don't u have any better things to do? Let me ask you the same questions. You have been posting messages on talk pages of other users telling them to "mind their own business' or to leave "your article " aloneor "why are you after me". You have been indulging in sockpuppetry despite being warned against it. You have been trying to find out my real identity on the net.

Dont you have any better things to do?--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 10:09, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:DebiPrasadPal.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:DebiPrasadPal.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DeeptiBhatnagar.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DeeptiBhatnagar.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kevin (talk) 05:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Shannon Whirry MMI.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Shannon Whirry MMI.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Shannon Whirry MMI.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Shannon Whirry MMI.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Shannon Whirry MMI.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Shannon Whirry MMI.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Shannon Whirry MMI.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DeeptiBhatnagar.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DeeptiBhatnagar.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 18:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:DeeptiBhatnagar.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:DeeptiBhatnagar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sakshi-Sivanand.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sakshi-Sivanand.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 07:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:DebiProsadPal.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DebiProsadPal.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --—SpacemanSpiff 07:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive. The next time you upload or link any copyrighted image, you will be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 14:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marking edits as minor and lack of edit summaries

You are making massive changes in articles and marking them minor. This is a misuse of the label, and I am asking you to stop it. You should also be using edit summaries. Communication with other editors is a vital part of being an editor. Dougweller (talk) 21:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 12:45, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent, deliberate image copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cupidcobra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for a long time. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Although usually we give editors who were blocked a long time ago a little leeway, you were blocked for copyright violations, which potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy. We must be assured that you understand what copyright is, when and how copyrighted content can be used on Wikipedia, and what license Wikipedia uses before unblocking you. Please read WP:COPYVIO. I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.