User talk:CucumberDentalFloss

May 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CucumberDentalFloss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I deserve a second chance. I pledge not to do anything illegal, and will do my best to be a positive editor.CucumberDentalFloss (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a government with authority over you, so violations of policy are not illegal. You will need to describe the contributions you want to make as well as what was wrong with your edits in order to demonstrate your understanding. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've reblocked the user as a sock. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GeraldFord1980.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CucumberDentalFloss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, so I posted some nonsense edits. I realize now that this is frowned upon. I promise not to do it again. CucumberDentalFloss (talk) 16:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't address your violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE, and you clearly already knew vandalism was frowned upon, given you've been doing this for more than a decade. Yamla (talk) 16:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CucumberDentalFloss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You asked me to address my violations, which is fair enough. In all of my edits, I had a momentary lapse in judgment, much like someone with incontinence who soils their underwear. I am now fully in control of my actions, and will be a positive member of the Wikipedia community from this point forward.CucumberDentalFloss (talk) 18:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No you won't. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 21:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're wasting everyone's time. I've revoked talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would say so. A momentary lapse in judgement ceases to be momentary if it occurs every single time. 331dot (talk) 20:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]