User talk:Ctsai1

AfD nomination of Christopher Tsai

I have nominated Christopher Tsai, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Tsai. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Paste (talk) 20:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Christopher Tsai. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 20:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Christopher Tsai

A tag has been placed on Christopher Tsai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ukexpat (talk) 20:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Christopher Tsai. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. same goes for Afd templates ukexpat (talk) 20:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Christopher Tsai, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Paste (talk) 20:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Christopher Tsai, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is not a joke - please take heed of these warnings. ukexpat (talk) 21:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 21:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Christopher Tsai. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ctsai1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ukexpat (talk) 04:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I am offering you a chance for this account to be unblocked due to checkuser result (per Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ctsai1). If your editing behavior continues to be destructive, you will find yourself to be blocked again. If you wish to be unblocked, please indicate your will as well as promise to be constructive to the community, then I will unblock your account. (I have watchlisted this talk page) OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 04:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]