User talk:Cstene07/sandbox
Hello Erhall (talk) 22:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC) CSkibba07 Looks like a good start, just need more resources
Looks good but keep up the research. Jessben12 (talk)
Great start to your lit reivew, very informative and articulate. Kdrost09 (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
good start! AHughes08 (talk) 22:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Great start! Good use of citing. Jlinehan07 (talk) 22:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cstene07 (talk • contribs)
You have a good start. I do not see any mechanical errors in your paragraphs. This is quality work. Good luck! Swpols410 (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Good start Katie, I really like the overview about what civic agency is, cause I was completely lost on the concept. Make sure you include more of your sources, and explain how the information from your sources will aid you in your own personal research. Nice job Ytfig11 (talk) 23:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Caitlin, this is good work. I'm excited to read about your topic. It looks like you've got a great handle on how to write a literature review. I didn't see any errors, and you had great citations. Wjansen08 (talk) 20:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
You have a very good start to your literature review. Jjdick3978 —Preceding undated comment added 20:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC).
You have a really good start on your article, and you seem to have gotten the hang of using references (Make sure you use varied references as you go on; not just the one). Keep it up ! ManishEarthTalk • Stalk 10:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Agree with Manisearth- great start continue to pull in more resources. Erhall (talk) 18:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)