User talk:CrnoBelo

Gallery

You must add new section for galleries, and that before "See also", "References", and "External links" section. Like this. Please, check your additions, and add that title, in order to fix those articles. And, always, keep it cool. If you have any problem with usage of images, raise a talk page question about it, and talk to it, up to the solution. All best, be well. :) --WhiteWriter^speaks 18:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Closure of the report at the edit-warring noticeboard

CrnoBelo, please see the result of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive195#User:CrnoBelo reported by User:Sokac121 (Result: Both warned). Both you and Sohac121 are warned for edit warring about images of churches in articles on Serbian villages. If reverts continue before there is any serious effort to find consensus, blocks are possible. I'm leaving you a notice of the provisions of the WP:ARBMAC decision. Be aware that User:WhiteWriter is familiar with the article in dispute and both of you might ask him for suggestions. Whether it was intentional or not, moving images of churches based on which denomination it was might be considered to be expressing an ethnic or religious viewpoint. If you want a systematic change in placement of churches based on population try opening a WP:Request for comment, or discuss the matter at WP:WikiProject Serbia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

EdJohnston (talk) 00:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, CrnoBelo. You have new messages at WhiteWriter's talk page.
Message added 12:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

WhiteWriter^speaks 12:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, CrnoBelo. You have new messages at WhiteWriter's talk page.
Message added 16:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

WhiteWriter^speaks 16:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please, watchlist my talk page, as i may fill your talkpage with this TB templates.. :) --WhiteWriter^speaks 21:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Dont add maps as main pictures in infobox. I am afraid that that is not improvement. --WhiteWriter^speaks 15:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CrnoBelo, please see a comment which I left for you at WhiteWriter's talk page. These issues are important because you have already been warned under WP:ARBMAC. Admins can issue topic bans if it appears that someone is unable to edit neutrally on Balkan articles. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please, remove all POV templates you placed on articles. That is very wrong, and you are pushing very much. I told you, that attitude is not logical and it is violation of viki rules. This should not be ethnically divided wiki, but representation of the villages. Watch them, and when some better image show up, switch them. But you must not disturb the wiki to prove your point. If it is that much important to you, find some images, and add them to wiki. Remove all POV templates, as you are not actually allowed just to tag article without any talk page discusion with it. Instead, solve this issue, and dont leave it like this. Do you have some other solution to this? --WhiteWriter^speaks 17:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CrnoBelo, please pay attention to WhiteWriter's advice. You are getting close to a topic ban from these articles under WP:ARBMAC. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bečej, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please explanation for this [1].--Sokac121 (talk) 10:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know my position well. As long as infobox image does not represent majority religion in that village article is not NPOV. CrnoBelo (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tendentious editing on illustration of articles on Serbian villages

Per this edit I see you are continuing your campaign to change the illustration of town articles based on the religion of the church involved. This is your last chance to stop using religion or ethnicity as a criterion. If this continues, you may be placed on a topic ban regarding churches in Serbia under the provisions of WP:ARBMAC. Please respond promptly and agree to drop your campaign before I take formal action. So far you don't appear to be listening. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]