User talk:Crisler

James Scott Porter

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article James Scott Porter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to George Anderson Hopper. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Blueboy 96 05:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After discovering some more instances where you apparently cut-and-pasted material from the Texas Execution Information database, I decided to block you for 72 hours. You obviously know about our copyright policy, based on the edits you've made about executed inmates. Therefore, your copyright violations are not acceptable, and the fact they stayed on Wikipedia for a year makes it even worse. I advise you to have a good look at our copyright policy, as the next block will be indefinite. Blueboy 96 05:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Varian v. Delfino

Your editing history indicates that your edits are solely about this case, and about death row inmates. Delfino and Day, parties to the Varian litigation, have written a book about death row inmates. "Crisler" is the name of the HR person at Varian with whom Delfino and Day had a dispute. I thus ask, pursuant to the conflict of interest policy: do you have any relationship with any of the parties in this case? Whether or not you are related, I do recommend you read Wikipedia policies on neutral editing and writing about living persons. THF (talk) 17:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Anthony Mobley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Anthony Mobley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Anthony Mobley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dexter Lee Vinson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dexter Lee Vinson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from Michelangelo Delfino, Mary E. Day (2008). Death Penalty USA 2005–2006, pages 251–255.. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Nomination of Derrick Wayne Frazier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derrick Wayne Frazier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derrick Wayne Frazier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Inexpiable (talk) 12:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]