User talk:Crhamar

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bert Marcus.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! _nonsense ferret 03:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bert Marcus concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bert Marcus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bert Marcus

Hello Crhamar. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Bert Marcus".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bert Marcus}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:How to Make Money Selling Drugs (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 07:05, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Champs (film)

I'm getting a bit tired of cleaning up this article. Please read our guideline on conflicts-of-interest and forward that page to all your fellow crew members who are tempted to edit the Wikipedia article.

Your text, "... the epic story of the rise ... " is a copy-paste of this text. This is not only plagiarism but also copyright violation. Please do not bulk copy-paste text into Wikipedia, even if you were the one who originally wrote it. Second, please do not add statements such as "met with critical acclaim" without a citation. For one thing, they are highly promotional. We need a reliable source to confirm that the reception was positive. Next, I notice that you blatantly removed a negative review. Do not do that. You can be blocked from editing for disruption if you continue to push a strong POV, violate copyright, and remove valid citations. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is twice now I've had to revert your edits. Same issues: copyright violation, removing a negative review, promotional language, etc. If you continue your disruptive editing, you can be blocked from editing. Wikipedia takes copyright violations seriously; please consider this carefully before you add the text again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:46, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:20, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As a note to the above, I'll be happy to unblock you (or let another admin do so), as soon as you acknowledge that you cannot copy and paste copyrighted text into Wikipedia. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC).[reply]