User talk:Creepy Crawler

AfD nomination of Survivors Strike Back

An editor has nominated Survivors Strike Back, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivors Strike Back and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 15:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice UK

Hello, Creepy Crawler and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins 19:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MySpider-Man3Picture.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MySpider-Man3Picture.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Michael Pierce

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Bradley Michael Pierce, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.144.53.226 01:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of repeated banning

Check User_talk:EJBanks#Confirmed_sockpuppets for some history on this person's repeatedly banned sockpuppets. Doczilla 04:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Creepy Crawler for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ThuranX 00:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of previous evidence for the history

Evidence has been moved to Category talk:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Creepy Crawler. Doczilla _RAWR! 05:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:The Apprentice US contestants

I have nominated Category:The Apprentice US contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Creepy Crawler! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 35 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Jim Lunsford - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of candidates on The Apprentice listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of candidates on The Apprentice. Since you had some involvement with the List of candidates on The Apprentice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice Candidates listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Apprentice Candidates. Since you had some involvement with the The Apprentice Candidates redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of winners on The Apprentice listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of winners on The Apprentice. Since you had some involvement with the List of winners on The Apprentice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic The Hedgehog Kings listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sonic The Hedgehog Kings. Since you had some involvement with the Sonic The Hedgehog Kings redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Reach Out to the Truth 22:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darrell Thomas Utley

The article Darrell Thomas Utley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CiphriusKane (talk) 22:49, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benjy Hawk

The article Benjy Hawk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unreferenced, WP:BEFORE reveals zero character analysis sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CiphriusKane (talk) 22:55, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Darrell Thomas Utley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darrell Thomas Utley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrell Thomas Utley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CiphriusKane (talk) 01:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Lunsford

The article Jim Lunsford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor, WP:BEFORE shows lack of significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CiphriusKane (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]