User talk:Creeperboy22011

Welcome!

Hi Creeperboy22011! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Konstantina07 (talk) 16:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Tornado outbreak of April 19–20, 2023

An article that you have been involved in editing—Tornado outbreak of April 19–20, 2023—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 17:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on February 2024 California atmospheric rivers

Hey I noticed you made an unsourced contribution to February 2024 California atmospheric rivers claiming that 2 tornados touched down in San Luis Obispo county. I confirmed that there were in fact 2 tornados that touched down and corrected the formatting as well as adding a source. For future reference make sure you cite sources when adding content to articles. Thanks! ZombiUwU ♥ ^{(🌸~♥~ 📝)} 00:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Lokicat3345 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lokicat3345. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 23:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creeperboy22011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I restored the page because some people thought it should be given a second chance. If another user had a similar idea, it is completely coincidental. Creeperboy22011 (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not a coincidence at all, Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla There is only one piece of evidence presented in the sockpuppet discussion. This is not enough for me to be convinced. More evidence should be presented. Creeperboy22011 (talk) 23:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We aren't trying to convince you. --Yamla (talk) 23:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know Creeperboy22011 (talk) 00:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]