User talk:Crediblesport

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Operation Credible Sport, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 07:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crediblesport

OK EVIL ONESPARTAN, REspond to me about Credible sport. I know more about htis program than anyone else alive. I ahve been researching this program since 1986. I have thougnass of documents and have interviewed nearly everyone involved in the program. I am preparing a book lenght article on credible psort for publication. you whoever wrote the operation credible sport page is all wrong ther was never an operation Credible Sport. Project Credible sport yes. Honey Badger was not Credible Sport nor was project Max credinble spport! awating a reply! <email removed> —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crediblesport (talk • contribs) 10:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As stated several times before, if there's something wrong about a document, please take it to the talk page, or feel free to change the content on your own, provided you can give reliable sources. And please make an effort to use proper grammar when editing articles. If you need information, feel free to look at Wikipedia:Tutorial and Wikipedia:Article development. The Evil Spartan (talk) 10:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might also like to read up on WP:NPOV and WP:OR. If you believe something is wrong, it is imperative to state as much in only a neutral tone, including all possible angles. We also discourage the use of original research. The Evil Spartan (talk) 10:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of YMC-130H

A tag has been placed on YMC-130H requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gary King (talk) 06:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]