User talk:Creativehuman1990

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Creativehuman1990. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Shifa International Hospitals, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Veldsenk (talk) 14:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Veldsenk. Thank you for sharing the details. I noticed my recent updated on the page was reverted. While I'm not formally associated with the hospital, I however, have been a consumer of their services since long. I have updated and added the information with credible sources to improve the accuracy of the page. The sources I have used meet Wikipedia's standards for verifiability and are publicly accessible.

Do share your feedback on the updated content.

Thank you! Creativehuman1990 (talk) 11:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Bibliophile1970 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bibliophile1970. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblocking and Restoration of Edits

Dear Izno,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to formally request the unblocking of my account, "CreativeHuman", which has been restricted due to allegations of sockpuppetry and a perceived conflict of interest (COI).

I want to clarify that I have no connection to the local hospital (Shifa International Hospitals Limited) or any parties related to it, and my only aim was to contribute objectively and constructively to Wikipedia. The edits I made were based on reliable sources and aimed at correcting the conspicuous inaccuracies in the article.

I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia, and I assure you that my contributions were made with the intent of improving the content, not to promote any agenda. The claims of COI seem to stem from a misunderstanding, possibly influenced by the actions of the earlier editor(s) who appear to have a vested interest in maintaining a biased portrayal of the subject.

I kindly ask for a review of my edits, which are well-supported by credible references. I believe that restoring my contributions will enhance the accuracy of the article and serve the Wikipedia community.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I appreciate your consideration and look forward to resolving this issue.

Best regards,

CreativeHuman Creativehuman1990 (talk) 11:10, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Izno

I am writing to formally request the unblocking of my account, "CreativeHuman1990", which has been restricted due to allegations of sockpuppetry and a perceived conflict of interest (COI).

I want to clarify that I have no connection to the User: Bibliophile1970 or to Shifa International Hospitals Limited or any parties related to it. I am a frequent visitor of the hospital as an attendant of patients who are close family members. It was during one of my recent visits to the hospital (hospital stay) that I came across its Wikipedia page and found the information to be limited and biased. I therefore did my homework and based on reliable resources, decided to make necessary edits and update the information. My only aim was to contribute objectively and constructively to Wikipedia as I believe it was my responsibility to correct the information of a hospital with high repute.

I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia, and I assure you that my contributions were made with the intent of improving the content, not to promote any agenda. The claims of COI seem to stem from a misunderstanding.

I kindly ask for a review of my edits, which are well-supported by credible references. I believe that restoring my contributions will enhance the accuracy of the article and serve the Wikipedia community.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I appreciate your consideration and look forward to resolving this issue.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creativehuman1990 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User conduct is not connected in any way to the block

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry to Haleema Hassan, as clear as they come. Yamla (talk) 14:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.