User talk:CreamyGoodne55

September 2020

I will not have any discussion of the antics of one idiotic user and the support of him by admin on my talk page. If you wish to discuss it then go to the threads already discussing it.CreamyGoodne55 (talk) 15:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Just wanted to say don't be too disheartened by this article being nominated for deletion, I know if can be frustrating when you put loads of work in. It's nice to see someone interested in Lincolnshire cricket. The Lincolnshire County Cricket Club article and the various Lincolnshire cricket grounds all need expanding, so maybe there's an area you could contribute too? WP:CRICKET is always looking for new members too. All the best. StickyWicket (talk) 22:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

• Hi AssociateAffiliate and thanks for your kind words. Unfortunately myself and the people I have workded with will not be doing any more work on Wikipedia because of the ridicuous actions of Wjemather and his attempt to monopolise his precious pages. If you want to try and get in touch with me privately I can let you know of the work we do outside of here in terms of researching lincolnshire cricket. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CreamyGoodne55 (talk • contribs)

• You are actually wrong about Wikipedia's purpose, it is not to merely preserve information. It is to summarize independent reliable sources. If you just want to post and preserve information, there are appropriate venues to do that. I'm sorry you haven't had a good experience. 331dot (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

• 331dotTo be honest I really couldnt care any more. This is just funny now hes deleting comments on the deletion topic because his little games have been found out. You defending him just makes it more funny CreamyGoodne55 (talk) 15:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 17:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CreamyGoodne55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I feel like 331dot should not be involved in this process as he clearly has an agenda here, shown by his private discussions with the person that is at the center of this problem [2]. I have shown as much proof as I can literally give that the person is targettting the pages that I have uploaded, contributed to and looked after and the admin in question has now banned me twice while I defend my case. If he wants to defend bullies and gatekeepers then fine, but to ban users when they call out what they see a clear injustice is at best embarrasing, at worst a matter for the general public to be aware of. If I can defend my case then what is the point of any of this. Why dont I just create a new account tomorrow and tage 10,000 articles of similar to mine for deletion and prove the ridiculousness of it? CreamyGoodne55 (talk) 17:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No need to consider lifting the block as you have stated you have no intention of editing further. If you change your mind, you are welcome to request another unblock review. Stick to talking about your own actions, though; unblock requests like this are completely inappropriate. WP:GAB will help you understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You said that "we are all in 100% agreement that we will not be doing any more work on wikipedia "; so you've changed your mind? Threatening to evade your block doesn't help your case-which someone else will review. 331dot (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

• 331dotSo do you ban every person who says they are no longer going to contribute on the website? Im defending myself against people that want to attack my work. Whether or not that means I do anything on Wikipedia past that should play no part in banning somone, and If Im honest contributes to my point that your not being neutral in any of this.CreamyGoodne55 (talk) 17:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

I block(not ban, which is different) people for the reasons that I stated when making the block. If you have intentions of editing or otherwise contributing to this project further, you are free to make another request. 331dot (talk) 18:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The George Marshall Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The George Marshall Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The George Marshall Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 14:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Isle of Axholme Evening league

I have closed the deletion discussion for this article as 'delete' because there is wide agreement that we should not retain it. However, I just want to say that all your hard work has not been lost because the article has been picked up by the EverybodyWiki and you can find it here: Isle of Axholme Evening league. I have not looked thoroughly but I expect other pages that are no longer on Wikipedia are there too, like The Bob Welton cup and the North Lindsey League. The information that you have compiled has been preserved for the future but is resting in a different place. Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lincolnshire County Cricket League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lincolnshire County Cricket League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lincolnshire County Cricket League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 11:07, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Lindsey Cricket League (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:North Lindsey Cricket League and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:North Lindsey Cricket League, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 21:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, CreamyGoodne55! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 21:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:North Lindsey Cricket League

Hello, CreamyGoodne55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North Lindsey Cricket League, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)