Jump to content

User talk:Crazy131

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Crazy131, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! JodyB talk 20:23, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Reference Errors on 13 December

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Martin Lücker

[edit]

Sorry, I don't get it. I create a new article, put "a start" in the edit summary, which stands for "it will be expanded", and a minute later you do what? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Eurovision!
You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Eurovision. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project.

We offer a place for you to connect with users who also like Eurovision and facilitate team work in the development of Eurovision articles.

If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list, and add the project talk page to your watchlist.
I hope you accept! - Wes Mouse 16:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please take care.

[edit]

Hello Crazy131. May i point out that when you thanked an IP here, you were thanking them for an edit which, if not vandalism, did not in the least help Wikipedia and which i have since reverted. While thanking IPs and encouraging them to create accounts is useful (and i thank you for doing it) it is necessary to be sure that they have been helpful in the edit(s) we thank them for. Cheers, LindsayHello 04:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Crazy131. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Robertsdale elementary".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Crazy131/Robertsdale elementary}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 19:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mean as custard (talk) 15:10, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

C J Townrow & Sons

[edit]

Please explain for me the tags you added to C J Townrow & Sons, replying right here.--DThomsen8 (talk) 17:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leadership election articles.

[edit]

These types of articles are common across Wikipedia. See Liberal Party of Canada leadership election, 2013, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island leadership election, 2003 & Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta leadership election, 2014, for examples. GoodDay (talk) 17:59, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 80 Days (2014 video game) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | developer = [[Inkle (Video Game Company|Inkle]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Crazy131. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 () 06:27, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]