User talk:Crasch

February 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Randolph Hencken, from its old location at User:Crasch/Randolph Hencken. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, User:KGirlTrucker81! Crasch (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randolph Hencken (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still not satisfying our basic policies as there's also no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Randolph Hencken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hencken & seasteading institute

Did you ever get anybody to help you work on Draft:Randolph_Hencken, or integrate the summarized material into Seasteading? I see you made some edits, but I'm not sure if you were satisfied you had finished working in all the sources or not. I ran across this one,[1] in particular, which gives some details specific to Hencken. 47.222.203.135 (talk) 15:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Randolph Hencken concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Randolph Hencken, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]