User talk:Craptacular
Welcome!
Hello Craptacular, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- SoothingR(pour) 11:31, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
The Show Must Go On (Queen song)
[edit]Hello! I have nominated your recently submitted article The Show Must Go On (Queen song) as a candidate for Wikipedia's DYK. Good luck! --malber 15:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks! Looks like your suggestion was a success! Appreciated. -Craptacular 11:41, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Vandalism
[edit]Stop pushing your POV. Read the talk pages before you make an edit to the Freddie Mercury article. Klymen 14:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Queen
[edit]STOP re-addng song pages these songs are not notable see Wikipedia:WikiProject Queen/songs.--miketm - Queen WikiProject - 12:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- You can't just remove large amounts of information without any sort of debate. I shall be restoring every article that you delete. For example, The March of the Black Queen is without a doubt a notable due to it's musical complexity and popularity with Queen fans. So it stays. Craptacular 12:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- These articles should never been created.--miketm - Queen WikiProject - 12:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- And what gives you the right to determine this? Why should you wield the power to say what is and what isn't created? You are not a moderator of Queen-related articles on Wikipedia. Stop being so despotic.Craptacular 12:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- see Wikipedia:Notability (songs), These articles will be deleted soon or later its better to do it now --miketm - Queen WikiProject - 12:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- if you want you can help merge the articals. (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Queen/albums) -- miketm - Queen WikiProject - 14:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- And what gives you the right to determine this? Why should you wield the power to say what is and what isn't created? You are not a moderator of Queen-related articles on Wikipedia. Stop being so despotic.Craptacular 12:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- miketm, "merge" doesn't mean "delete" the whole content of an article. As I said on your talk page: I don't understand why you delete (redirect) song articles before their content is moved to the album articles... Candyfloss 16:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Innuendosinglecover.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Innuendosinglecover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Craptacular. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Craptacular. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)