User talk:Craitman17

Your edits to PEZ

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Beakerboy 15:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Scouting for girls

A tag has been placed on Scouting for girls, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Whpq 17:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:JosephGleeson. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron⁸³ 09:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: United Home kit

Yes, I noticed that the other day. Unfortunately, I didn't make the kit image used in the Man Utd article, so I don't have the ability to change it myself. Thanks for pointing it out though. - PeeJay 14:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Molvanîa flag.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Molvanîa flag.PNG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Devon articles

I had no idea what you were planning to do with those. They were little more than "X is a town in Devon." Sorry if I created more work for you, but small stubs like that are usually redirected back to a broader article. Won't happen again now that I know what you have in mind. User:Blofeld of SPECTRE does the same things with French towns and I should have concluded that you were doing the same. Thanks for letting me know. Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Klaksvík twin towns

Hi, Where did you found informations about Klaksvík twin towns? I was on the Trondheim website about it and there was no Klaksvík in that list. Viltharis (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. I thought that you put this information on page about Klaksvík. I found this information in www.klaksvik.fo, but website of Trondheim says that they "have close ties with Klaksvik (The Faroe Islands)" ([1]) so what do you think - we should trust Faroese site or Norwegian? :) Viltharis (talk) 18:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self; re: French Twin Town CoAs

Need to do;

Cornwall

Devon

Hampshire

Lincolnshire

Wimbledon

Please stop making 'spelling' edits to the Wimbledon articles. The diacritics discussion for tennis articles is a complicated one, and no consensus has been reached neither for nor against their use. However, the current pratice is to avoid them, until, eventually, a consensus is reached. So please don't make unilateral decisions on that matter, and stop (and possibly revert) all your 'spelling' edits. 82.124.123.76 (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as I said, it's not that I desperately want incorrect and unprofessional information, but the diacritics discussion a complicated one, and it involve many, many, many differents points of view. It can't be settled by one single user. You may want to take at look at one part of the discussion here. 82.124.123.76 (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Micronations

Hi there. As a contributor to the Micronations Wikiproject, this discussion may be of some interest to you: [2] --Gene_poole (talk) 09:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Unifixxi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Unifixxi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Mark (Mschel) 12:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of David Vržogić

An article that you have been involved in editing, David Vržogić, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Vržogić. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bneidror (talk) 08:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stoke Gabriel

Hi. Population figures (amongst others) come from here Pit-yacker (talk) 17:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:18, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Regions' Cup

It was a valid information. To the UEFA Refions' Cup qualify the champion of the Ukrainian Amateur Association. I agree that some of the info was to some degree corupt, but here is the official web-site of the Ukrainian Amateur Association. The site shows the official names of the teams. UEFA is an illiterate organization or at least they hire such. You can use translate option to translate it to English. [3]. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 21:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. But how UEFA identifies those regions in Ukraine? By their administrative division? Did you know that current administrative division more than often does not respond to the name of actual regions? The Ukrainian Amateur Association advises upon which team will be representing Ukraine at UEFA Regions' competition. For the first edition of the tournament they, indeed, sent the collective team. The next teams in actuality were clearly represented by an individual club. For example, there are two teams from Odessa Oblast, but the fact is those were two completely diffrent teams. Besides, the UEFA web-site states that one of the team is Bastion Illichivsk, but for whatever reason on the wikipedia the team is simply identified as team of Odessa Oblast. I believe there should be a consistency or an explanation for that reason. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Here is what I found:

Current competition Turn your attention to Group 6. It says Bastion Illichivski. It should be Bastion Illichivsk. Illichivsk is a coastal city in close proximity to Odessa.
2006-07 competition Ivan competed, I believe, for a season in the Ukrainian Second League.
2004-05 competition KZESO is actually an abbreviation and Kakhovka the city's name.
2002-03 competition Pivdenstal from Yenakiieve has a history of professional-level competitions.
2000-01 competition Dnister played its games in Odessa.
1999 competition That was the collective team from the best amateur clubs from Ukraine.

On the personal note, what did you mean when you said something about my problem? It seemed as if you're getting a liitle bit irritated. The problem is with the article which, I believe, can be improved. If you're taking it personal, please, accept my apologies. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 18:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 UEFA Regions' Cup

Please read the guidelines at Template:Current sport. A current event template is supposed to be used to warn our readers that an article is being massively edited and/or rapidly changing. If the article is stable, there is no reason to warn our readers. Templates like this one are not supposed to be used to merely inform our readers that something is ongoing, since that is already obvious from the article itself. --Conti|✉ 17:59, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds fine by me. Just make sure to remove the template again when editing calms down. --Conti|✉ 18:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

El Clasico

That "supposed facts" about Real Madrid violate the neutral point of view of wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cid Campeador (talk • contribs) 18:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Worcestershire

Hello. I was interested to see that your flags page had a link to a flag of Worcestershire. I must admit that, despite living in the county, I've never seen that flag before. I'm curious now: where did you find it? Loganberry (Talk) 03:26, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please undo your changes to Teitur Thordarson

You have gone against consensus. Your changes were unannounced and unappreciated. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I figured out how to do it myself. Please see Talk:Teitur Thordarson for the history on the subject. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to say, if you want to undo them, I'm not stopping you. I'm personally in the mind that names should be spelled correctly (just because the English-speaking media is ignorant enough to not use nonstandard letters, doesn't mean Wikipedia should follow suit), that's all... Ը२ձւե๓ձռ¹⁷ 13:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Volleyball

I have seen that you are listed under Wikiproject Volleyball. Some players articles, most of them looks outdated. I would like to improve players by country. Could you please choose a country to contribute with? Please take a look on Yekaterina Gamova, Hélia Souza, Serena Ortolani and Kenia Carcaces for a model to follow. Please can you please improve some volleyball players with infobox and some addons? References are very important. Let me know. Oscar987 21:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Flag of cheshire.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of cheshire.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Flag of cumbria.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of cumbria.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Flag of warwickshire.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of warwickshire.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Flag of worcestershire.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of worcestershire.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2010–12 Continental Beach Volleyball Cup

Hi just wanted to see if you would be interested in helping with this article 2010–12 Continental Beach Volleyball Cup? This is an Olympics qualification tournament for the 2012 Summer Olympics. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Intoronto1125 (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nation of YAN

Hi, why are there no references about the Nation of YAN on wikipedia? Havent they even hosted a micronational olympics? Did they cease to be? Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.75.167.22 (talk) 02:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Normally the requirement for a micronation to be included on Wikipedia is a third-party reference. Maybe they've not got the notoriety to be included just yet, but I'm pretty sure they're still alive. I'm far from the authority on the matter though! Ը२ձւե๓ձռ¹⁷ 07:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cleanup invitation

I've formatted the WikiProject Cleanup page to include members for those that are interested in joining, similar to how other projects have members. Since you've contributed relatively recently to the project's list page, I formally extend this invitation to join WikiProject Cleanup! I've also created a userbox template for members to use on their user pages. Thank you for your contributions to help improve Wikipedia! Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject volleyball - message for members

There is a discussion in WikiProject Volleyball about the proposal for Notability Guide for Volleyball Players. Participation of project members is required, but at the same time, editors outside the project are welcome to join the discussion. Osplace 17:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Flag of tyne and wear.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of tyne and wear.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Volleyball Members message

As you signed as a member of WikiProject Volleyball, we are inviting you to take part of this discussion. Your point of view is highly appreciated. --Osplace 19:59, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Flag of shropshire.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of shropshire.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Flag of staffordshire.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of staffordshire.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Flag of leicestershire.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of leicestershire.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Flag of nottinghamshire.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of nottinghamshire.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Craitman17. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Craitman17. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Craitman17. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Provenance

Several years back, you uploaded this image - a photo of a painting. I don't suppose you know who the artist was? DS (talk) 05:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't give me any details about its provenance, I'll have to delete it (bearing in mind that deletions can be undone if circumstances change). DS (talk) 17:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]