User talk:CrafterNova/Archive/October 2022
This is an archive of past discussions with User:CrafterNova. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
"Template:Es" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Es and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 1#Template:Es until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Temperature-responsive polymer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UCST.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Benzamide
- added a link pointing to Pyramide
- Depyrogenation
- added a link pointing to Pyrogen
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
"Template:R from sub" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:R from sub and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 14#Template:R from sub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks.. Also added your guestbook on a list
Thanks also for signing mine. I have added your guestbook here on your behalf. Feel free to undo it. Happy editing...Volten001 ☎ 20:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you and welcome. Happy editing to you too! —CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 12:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Help me
Hello CrafterNova/Archive. You used the {{Help me}} template, but you wanted an answer from a specific editor. If you still need help, please add your question to that editor's talk page instead, or reply to them here using the {{Reply to}} template. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. |
Please help me with a new biographical article Thomas J. Martin
I'm writing this article about an Australian pathologist and have created a draft for it. I need help from expert BLP editors since there are very less reliable sources that I have found until now
Biographical sources:
- Centre for Transformative Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology. "Martin, Thomas John (Jack) - Person - Encyclopedia of Australian Science and Innovation". www.eoas.info. Retrieved 2022-10-29.
- Fioritti, Nathan (2016-11-22). "Professor Emeritus Thomas John Martin AO". Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences. Retrieved 2022-10-29.
Scientific sources:
- Martin, Thomas J.; Hovis, Jeffrey D.; Costantino, Joseph P.; Bierman, Morris I.; Donahoe, Michael P.; Rogers, Robert M.; Kreit, John W.; Sciurba, Frank C.; Stiller, Ronald A.; Sanders, Mark H. (2000-03-01). "A Randomized, Prospective Evaluation of Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure". American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 161 (3): 807–813. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.3.9808143. ISSN 1073-449X.
- Karsdal, Morten A; Martin, Thomas J; Bollerslev, Jens; Christiansen, Claus; Henriksen, Kim (2007-01-16). "Are Nonresorbing Osteoclasts Sources of Bone Anabolic Activity?". Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 22 (4): 487–494. doi:10.1359/jbmr.070109.
- Martin, Thomas J.; Procházka, K.; Munk, P.; Webber, S. E. (1996-01-01). "pH-Dependent Micellization of Poly(2-vinylpyridine)- block -poly(ethylene oxide)". Macromolecules. 29 (18): 6071–6073. doi:10.1021/ma960629f. ISSN 0024-9297.
- Anderson, S. J.; Greisemer, B. A.; Johnson, M. D.; Martin, T. J.; McLain, L. G.; Rowland, T. W.; Small, E. "Intensive Training and Sports Specialization in Young Athletes". publications.aap.org. Retrieved 2022-10-29.
- J. Martin, Thomas; R. Schmidt(rk), Richard (1992-10-06). "Efficient sialylation with phosphite as leaving group". Tetrahedron Letters. The International Journal for the Rapid Publication of Preliminary. 33 (41): 6123–6126. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)60022-9. ISSN 0040-4039. — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 13:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- See my response at the Teahouse just now. Incidentally, I doubt that the person who wrote the Tetrahedron Letters article is the Martin you are interested in. Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Maybe. I found the journal article on Google Scholar and copied it here so fast. Finding reliable sources is so hard especially when you write your first article. Perhaps you can help me by searching for a few more sources? — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 14:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Creating articles is really hard! That's why if you look at the Teahouse regularly you'll find newcomers to editing getting frustrated and being advised to stick to editing existing articles for many months to gain experience. Any Draft you create for Martin should be based on the two biographical sources you already have (there may be more, I haven't looked). One of them says he published hundreds of papers but if you want to find his most highly cited ones you need to be sure when you use Google Scholar that you have the correct person. Look at the institution / address in the authorship details for the highly cited papers which Google puts before the less cited ones. The point is that the biographies are about Martin while anything he has published is by him but not about him. In convincing new article reviewers that Martin is noteworthy enough to merit an article in Wikipedia, it is the former that matter. In creating drafts, quality is more important than quantity: you only need about WP:THREE WP:INDEPENDENT WP:SECONDARY sources. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Now I better understand since I have to look for the "institution / address in the authorship details" like you said. I have already found one or two independent sources, so finding more seems easier since now I know how to search for the correct person. Thank you so much ;) — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 16:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Creating articles is really hard! That's why if you look at the Teahouse regularly you'll find newcomers to editing getting frustrated and being advised to stick to editing existing articles for many months to gain experience. Any Draft you create for Martin should be based on the two biographical sources you already have (there may be more, I haven't looked). One of them says he published hundreds of papers but if you want to find his most highly cited ones you need to be sure when you use Google Scholar that you have the correct person. Look at the institution / address in the authorship details for the highly cited papers which Google puts before the less cited ones. The point is that the biographies are about Martin while anything he has published is by him but not about him. In convincing new article reviewers that Martin is noteworthy enough to merit an article in Wikipedia, it is the former that matter. In creating drafts, quality is more important than quantity: you only need about WP:THREE WP:INDEPENDENT WP:SECONDARY sources. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Maybe. I found the journal article on Google Scholar and copied it here so fast. Finding reliable sources is so hard especially when you write your first article. Perhaps you can help me by searching for a few more sources? — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 14:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)