User talk:CrackedLeo

Welcome

Hello CrackedLeo, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope that you have enjoyed contributing and want to stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started:

Learn the basics by reading the introduction and taking the tutorial.
Remember to sign messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~) to automatically insert your username and the date.
Enjoy editing to improve articles, but try to leave an edit summary to explain what you are doing.
Create your first article using the Article Wizard to help avoid common mistakes, which may lead to article deletion.
Although you don't need to be familiar with all of Wikipedia's policies, try to keep to the core principles and basic guidelines.
When dealing with fellow Wikipedians, please remain polite, solve problems calmly, and remember that no-one is out to get you.
Get involved with the community by joining a WikiProject.
Make any test edits in the sandbox or click here and create a sandbox of your own.
If you are having difficulty, consider finding a mentor to give you more personal advice.
If in doubt, be bold. If you make a mistake, it can easily be reverted.

If you need any more information, plenty of help is available - check out Wikipedia:Questions; ask your question here and attract help with the code {{helpme}}; or leave me a message on my talk page explaining your problem and I will help as best as I can. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 14:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bianca Montgomery image

This has been discussed before. You can weigh in on the matter in the following discussion section: Talk:Bianca Montgomery#Riegel as the main image. If you are one of the IPs who originally objected before, since it is clear that this article was your first edit, then all the better. But going against WP:Consensus is not the way. Discussion is. Flyer22 (talk) 19:01, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 19:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Reliable sources

Looking over the page you created (The Order (cyberterrorist gang)), I'm not sure you have a handle on reliable sources. Unofficial pages and reocities hosted pages aren't reliable sources. I'm unsure that a group from a forum that we don't even have an article on is notable, but I'll certainly give you a chance to find some better sourcing. 00:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm looking at the work you doing on the Order, and none of the references you've added thus far mention the Order that I can see. If I'm wrong can you show me where any of them do? AniMate 02:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the Virtual Kiss reference, looking at the question in the interview "How do you agree? Is there a process of voting?", it makes reference to Punisher and "his gang" as well as in The Dark Side reference and the academic article. In the last reference, it makes reference to just King Punisher who lead The Order. CrackedLeo (talk) 02:59, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem and the life savior to this article is that it talks about a group made in 1995 and back then virtual online enviroments were kinda of as much of a big deal as YouTube or Facebook, and because the Internet at the time was still more of a big deal during that time, it would be much easier for a group like this to become notable in that period on the web. The problem sets in that there may have been way more references that fell victim to link rot that might be able to increase the chances of this article's surivial. CrackedLeo (talk) 03:03, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How do you think this group satisfies the criteria listed at Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline? Frankly I can't see how this group would possibly satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (web). And no need to alert me to responses, I'm watching your talk page. AniMate 03:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I'm pointing to the notability guidelines is because the references you've given all contain trivial mentions of the group. No one seems to have written about them specifically. AniMate 03:20, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CrackedLeo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. GSK (talk ● evidence) 07:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Order (cyberterrorist gang)

The article The Order (cyberterrorist gang) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page was created by a user who has multiple sockpuppets. (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/CrackedLeo)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSK (talk ● evidence) 07:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]