User talk:Crabbylucy

Welcome!

Hello, Crabbylucy, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Pi zero (talk) 20:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

DYK for Lesley Thompson

On March 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lesley Thompson, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Very nice :-) --Crabbylucy (talk) 17:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alister Allan

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Alister Allan. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References added --Crabbylucy (talk) 17:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriele Bühlmann

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Gabriele Bühlmann. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References added --Crabbylucy (talk) 17:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Salas Chávez

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jorge Salas Chávez. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added reference, removed prod blp tag --Crabbylucy (talk) 02:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jorge Salas Chávez

The article Jorge Salas Chávez has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010 must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided reliable sources, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide sources within 10 days, you may request the article be undeleted when you have sources. NW (Talk) 00:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added reference, removed prod blp tag--Crabbylucy (talk) 02:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Crabbylucy. You have new messages at Ged UK's talk page.
Message added 11:54, 10 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ged UK 11:54, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Enrique Sieburger, Jr.

A tag has been placed on Enrique Sieburger, Jr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carlos Sieburger

A tag has been placed on Carlos Sieburger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:43, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of goals scored by African teams at the FIFA World Cup

I have nominated List of goals scored by African teams at the FIFA World Cup, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of goals scored by African teams at the FIFA World Cup. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Luxic (talk) 09:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let's try to make it up...

I'm sorry if I have been to harsh. Also, I don't want you to leave because – as I stated before – you are truly a good and commited editor. So, I decided I'm not going to nominate the article; even if it might not take long before someone else does. Actually, what I was trying to explain to you is that here it's not worth working against consesus, beacuse the only thing you get is a lot of frustration, as your articles are likely to be deleted. Anyway, there's still a chance to build a more afrocentric consensus: should someone nominate the African nations at the FIFA World Cup article, you may try to put a notice at WikiProject Africa asking for someone to give their opinion too.

I hope you'll read this message, and feel free to contact me if you need. :-) — Luxic (talk) 00:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]