User talk:Count of Monte Wiki

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Count of Monte Wiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 01:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kakocracy

Hi, thanks for this article! Unfortunately, we have an article on this concept already under the title kakistocracy. I've converted the article into a redirect-you're welcome to use your text to expand that article. Your text has not been deleted and is accessible here if you'd like to retrieve it.

If you feel that kakocracy is the most correct title for the kakistocracy article (I'm not taking a position here as I'm not a classicist), one option would be to open a move discussion–that link goes to a guide to how to do this. Blythwood (talk) 01:32, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Eranove) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Eranove.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article currently uses phrases like Emerging Capital Partners, a pan-African leader in private equity and with the ministry, an innovative program to facilitate... which are promotional without providing any real information and should be edited out with respect to neutrality.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domus Aurea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Panther (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blanche Merrilll

May I point out that none of your "NOP"s are original research, but are taken from the words of the texts that were used. There is no original point of views in that article. - kosboot (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to register my strong disagreement with your removal of so much information, much of which is your subjective opinion. There is no other source of information on this person. - kosboot (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kosboot: Hi, while I understand your concern, I believe it is fair to say that the article is excessively detailed and over-reliant on show reviews and critics' commentary, which offer at best oblique information on the subject. Furthermore, if there is no other source of information, then perhaps Blanche Merrill does not meet the notability requirements? However, I will refrain from removing more information from the page for now. Let me know if you have any suggestions on how to move forward. Best,Count of Monte Wiki (talk) 17:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]