User talk:Cosmic Cube

Hello, Cosmic Cube, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Abductive (reasoning) 05:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Increasing need to subdivide the Tobin tax article: your input wanted in discussion

There is an increasing need to subdivide the Tobin tax article: your input is wanted in discussion. Wikipedia policy requires a consensus on this discussion.

Please click here to go to the discussion. Thanks. - Boyd Reimer (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:05, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Hood tax

Hi, hope you don't mind me replying to you here, just thinking of the poor admin that has to read everything we've written before closing the AfD discussion. As you say theres been various other groups campaigning for revenue raising global FTT, but good sources that cover them in detail at the higher level of generality are hard to find (I has a quick search in some IPE journals and drew a blank even there). Even if we did have a new general article, Id still want us to keep RHT as theres been so much coverage for the specific campaign. I agree with you that the projects integrity is important, though I tend to the view its integrity is best maintained not by insisting editors dont create / contribute to articles on subjects they're connected to, but instead by staying true to our founding values especially WP:NPOV. Thanks for attempting to compromise and sorry we couldnt agree on this issue. FeydHuxtable (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good discussion on this issue. Cosmic Cube (talk) 02:59, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]