User talk:Corvettecrazy262

Welcome!

Hello, Corvettecrazy262, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --A Nobody^{My talk} 20:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article M4 Sherman, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hohum (talk) 00:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Sherman Firefly, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hohum (talk) 00:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Panther tank, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hohum (talk) 00:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to M4 Sherman. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hohum (talk) 02:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on M4 Sherman. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Hohum (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Operation Varsity, you will be blocked from editing. Skinny87 (talk) 08:52, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Operation Varsity. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. You have 3 reversions; one more and you will be blocked. Please take to the talk pages with reliable sources. Please also note that editing the lede (and not the body text) makes articles inconsistent. Awickert (talk) 04:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to American airborne landings in Normandy. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Skinny87 (talk) 08:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Operation Varsity. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Skinny87 (talk) 08:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene^talk 12:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've temporarily blocked your account as you seem to be running into lots of conflicts with other editors because you aren't paying attention to the warnings and advice you've been given here. Please slow down, take the time to read the links in your welcome message at the top of this page, and familiarise yourself with Wikipedia and its editing and conduct polices (especially edit warring and the three-revert rule). If you need help, you can ask here using the {{helpme}} template (instructions at the link), or you can ask on article or user talk-pages.

If you feel this block is unfair and want to contest it, you can use the {{unblock}} template (instructions at the link) to ask for an independent review. EyeSerene^talk 13:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Operation Varsity, you will be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Varsity

Please, don't edit-war further over the note in the lede. Enough sources were provided on the article talkpage to show that it is correct, and four citations have now been added to the note. I'd urge you to use the article talkpage for further discussion, and I welcome any comments you might have on the article as a whole, or tinkering with the lede note itself. I'd rather you weren't, but if you keep this up, I imagine you will be blocked for a longer period from editing. Skinny87 (talk) 08:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Resuming edit warring when coming off a block is a really bad idea; block lengths increase if they have to be applied more than once, and rapidly reach the point where it's felt that the patience of editors has been exhausted and you're blocked indefinitely. EyeSerene^talk 15:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--John (talk) 21:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]