User talk:Corsair1944

Welcome!

Hello, Corsair1944, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The Stooping Venus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The Llama! (talk) 22:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles

I think your articles about those books need more information to be wikipedia material. Love the effort though! The Llama! (talk) 22:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was just going to say something similar - there's nothing wrong with creating stubs, but if you're doing it just to get rid of the nasty red links on the author page it'd probably be best to leave the red links and work up the book articles one by one. pablo_hablo. 23:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get there -- working my way though reviews and writing my own -- love Bruce Marshall!

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Novels articles

I notice a number of additions by you for novels by the author of Girl in May. I can see you are keen on him, however you might like to consider writing article that have more to them. They would then have more chance of remaining on wikipedia as the short pieces you are writing add little in themselves. Don't let this discourage you, try checking out WP:NV for more information on writing such articles. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 11:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Marshall

Hello. I have created Category:Novels by Bruce Marshall so that you can add that category to all the articles you're creating. However, I must point out that articles consisting of one-line descriptions of the novels are not necessarily a good idea. I think this was already pointed out to you and I have to agree that it would make more sense to merge all of these into a single article, say List of novels by Bruce Marshall. It still makes sense to have stand-alone articles for his most important work and note that you can always put the redirects into the above category. (If you're unsure of what that last sentence means, let me know and I'll explain!) Pascal.Tesson (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The somewhat longer articles you have now been writing are not adequate either. Please see my comments for A Thread of Scarlet. You must find published book reviews for reliable sources and make references to them, you must at least talk about the publication of the book & the place in the author's work. You can describe the plot on the basis of the book itself, but you can not maker evaluative remarks on that basis--you have to quote them. And you cannot copy from some previously published source. I'd advise you to fix this very quickly, before it gets nominated for deletion.DGG (talk) 01:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Satan and Cardinal Campbell has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. §hawn poo 01:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Marshall

Hello, Corsair1944. You have new messages at Kevinalewis's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Capitan, New Mexico

Just curious: why {{Infobox Writer}} for a community article? Nyttend (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see. It's not difficult; see what I've done to it. Nyttend (talk) 03:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kern Plateau section edit

At the very top of all articles is a tab labeled "History"-click on that tab and a list of all edits made will display. Then compare my edit with the one just below it by clicking in the green circles next to both, then click on the gray buttton that says "compare selected versions" and both edits will display with changes/edits in red text. Then have your sense of humor engaged....I'm really tired of you and User:Fordpinto77 attempts at vandalism to this article, and am just about ready to report it. Humor always helps in an irritating situation.

If you can write about some history on the guard station-is it within the wilderness boundaries? Is it abandoned or maintained? Since there are no vehicles allowed in a wilderness, how is the structure used today? etc I'd be happy with that, but tell your buddy to keep his girlfriend's pic out of the article. Marcia Wright (talk) 14:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Trout Wilderness

Dear Corsair1944, My apologies for acting like the Troll Under The Bridge with this article. I have re-added your photo, did some easy research and wrote a little bit on the trail,etc. I would be interested in your opinion of what I added, and maybe we can both work together to add more information-for example, in the book where I got this info, there is a reference to the Tunnel Meadow Guard Station as a Registered National Historic Place. More details on that would be relevant, a new section titled "Historical Sites" could even be done. Do you have the time to work on this article? Marcia Wright (talk) 14:40, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Marcia, Thank you much for your kind words. I think that your edits are quite good. I would be happy to work on this article with you. As to Tunnel Meadow GS, it was destroyed in a fire (structure fire, not a forest fire) sometime around 2000. It was quite a nice structure in a very scenic spot. I might be able to get some pictures of it from friends. There were also a number of Guard Stations on the western part of the GTW (I am only familiar with the eastern part). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corsair1944 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm almost as finished as I can get on my currant project-creating an article on the Bonny Doon Ecological Reserve in the Santa Cruz Mountains-so as far as Golden Trout Wilderness, what do you think needs the most work? The photo you mentioned above sounds interesting, although I was unable to find any listing in the National Register. In fact the hiking guidebook may have been referring to Jordan Hot Springd and trail, not the guard station. I have some stuff downloaded about the state fish-that section needs expansion definitely. So let me know -here on your page, I am watching it-what we can do to improve this article. Cheers, User:Marcia Wright(not logged in) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.81.51.15 (talk) 01:05, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:RIDGE.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:RIDGE.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 00:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Corsair1944! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Dietrich Haugk - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Walter Van Tilburg Clark fan page on Facebook.

I see you've done quite a bit of editing on the Walter Van Tilburg Clark wikipedia entry. If you have Facebook, you may want to join us? I started the page last June (2009) and had NO fans until the last 10 days, when two of Clark's grandchildren joined.Christian Roess (talk) 10:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to The Fair Bride. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 02:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images, however, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads and users who repeatedly upload or misuse non-free images may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page.

Fair-use shots of book covers etc are almost always only considered permissible on the article on the book, not the author, as a rule. If you see other examples which break the rule, please let me know so I can correct them too. --John (talk) 03:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Marshall Grave.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Marshall Grave.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This can be very helpful

Dear M. Corsair1944, Here is a on the spot self survey for active Editors, without turning to look at your histories, try to answer the following from your gut reaction. What percentage of your work on wiki is: adding content? editing content? revediting others content? Deleting? blocking/unblocking? making warnings? Now jot down your answers, and then check your histories, how accurate were your gutguesses?

curious to hear, thanks for taking the time if you do! BespokeFM (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Marx the First (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mother Superior and Vatican

Urban the Ninth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mother Superior

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Corsair1944. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Corsair1944. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Corsair1944. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Corsair1944. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Children earth.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Children earth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Accounting bruce.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Accounting bruce.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of High Brows for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article High Brows is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Brows until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 14:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flutter in the Dovecote

The article Flutter in the Dovecote has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK or WP:NFICTION. No sources for 15 years. No reviews found in Wikipedia Library (general search) or ProQuest.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]