User talk:Correctonator

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Correctonator, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! J Milburn 18:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terror Toons 2: The Sick and Silly Show

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Terror Toons 2: The Sick and Silly Show, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. J Milburn 02:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terror Toons

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Terror Toons, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. J Milburn 02:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phantasm V

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Phantasm V, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. J Milburn 02:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the above articles...

I do not doubt that the films are real. What I am saying is that I see no evidence that they are notable, and so deserving of an encyclopedia article. Do you think you could provide some reliable sources to attribute each to? On another note, the articles make rather liberal use of italics and bulletpoints- there's nothing wrong with standard prose! J Milburn 02:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you cite the information to reliable sources, there shouldn't be any problem. I will take a look over the articles you have created if you wish- just drop me a line on my talk page with the links to them. Also, you can date and sign your posts on talk paes automatically by typing ~~~~ after your post. To see what that looks like, see mine- J Milburn 12:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as I said, I do not doubt that the films are real. I just have a concern that they may be non notable. Do you have any reliable sources about the films? Wikipedia is not about anything and everything- for instance, there is no article on me, or my friends' band, or the film that another friend has recently made at school and is telling me about right now. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and must be based upon secondary sources, and without reliable secondary sources, writing an article on a subject is impossible. J Milburn 16:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind helping you- I would rather the articles were improved than deleted, and, even if they do end up deleted, at least you will be a little wiser for the next articles you write. Basically, Wikipedia is not about everything. It is about notable things- not every band ever can have an article, not every person ever can have an article, not every book ever written can have an article. I am concerned that the films that you are writing about are not notable- that they have never been written about in any reliable sources. Now, if you could provide some reliable sources- perhaps reviews on websites, perhaps articles in magazines, something like that, then there would be no problem. Take a read of this to see why we only want notable topics, see here for our guideline on notability and see here for an explanation of what reliable sources are. If you have some sources already, show them to me, and I will judge them for how reliable they are. J Milburn 17:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, those are great sources. A couple of sources like that for each movie, and there should be no problem, and I will happily remove my deletion tags from the articles. Thanks for sticking with this- it's nice to see some committment and willingness to work with Wikipedia's system. So many newcomers just don't want to know. J Milburn 18:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove the tags when multiple reliable sources have been cited in the articles. You will need at least two on each article. Thanks. J Milburn 21:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is one good source on each of the Terror Toons article, but none on the other. Fan sites, first party publishings (so, written by people linked to the film) and message boards are all counted as unreliable, as are blogs. Sorry if this seems overly awkward, and thanks for sticking with this. I will remove the deletion tags when there are multiple reliable sources on each. J Milburn 21:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In theory, you should be getting your information to write the articles from reliable sources in the first place. If reliable sources are not added, then the articles will get deleted. J Milburn 22:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Terror Toons 2, one of the links isn't anything to do with the film. Terror Toons still only has one reliable source, and the same is true of Phantasm V. J Milburn 22:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not mad. Don't worry about it. There are still a few days until those articles are deleted. The source on the actor was reliable, it was just of no use because it didn't mention the film. The other source you mentioned confirms the existance, but we want secondary sources, and that was a primary one. J Milburn 23:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they are looking better now. Phantasm V could do with more sources, but I am sure you can do that later. Cheers! J Milburn 07:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better. I certainly have no issue with the articles any more, and I am happy for them to stay, and I would imagine almost everyone else would be. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. J Milburn 20:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Phantasm V

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Correctonator! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule proboards\d{1,3}\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 20:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Body counts

Please know that body counts are not encyclopedic, and should not be added to articles. They are strictly plot events, some very minor, with no real world context to them. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 03:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Voorhees

I'm not sure what you were trying to accomplish by changing the headers, but please do not do that again. Fictional characters do not get biographies. If you wish to write a biography on Jason, please feel free to write one on the Wikia page, which is linked at the bottom of the article. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 00:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Future films

I've removed the template from the article because I noticed that it's been used before, and it can only be used once. However, according to the notability guidelines for films, projects that are not yet in production do not deserve stand-alone articles. This is because any number of factors could interfere with the process that leads up to actual production -- scripting issues, casting issues, and budget issues. While IMDb is generally not to be trusted, the page for this project says that financing is being sought for the film. A film article can only exist if the film is in production -- that's when the likelihood of it being released is at its highest because of all the resources now invested in it. Some future projects that haven't entered production have homes at articles of broader topics, such as Spider-Man 4, Jurassic Park IV, Fahrenheit 451 (2008 film), Logan's Run (2010 film), etc. I suggest you do the same for Phantasm V. Let me know if you have any questions about how to go about doing this. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 03:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trancers III

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Trancers III, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105632/plotsummary. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:The Birds Duology

Template:The Birds Duology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Hnsampat (talk) 14:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Yin Yang Yo! Season 3 episodes

Hi there. If you have problems with an article, you should propose it for deletion. It is not for you to blank any page that you disagree with as that can be considered to be vandalism.

Then if that were to be the case, we need to know who started it first... --SecretAgentMan0079 (talk) 18:11, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Puppet Master: Axis of Evil

An article that you have been involved in editing, Puppet Master: Axis of Evil, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puppet Master: Axis of Evil. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. LA If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The House Party Series

Template:The House Party Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Crocodile Dundee Trilogy

Template:The Crocodile Dundee Trilogy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:50, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Look Who's Talking Trilogy

Template:The Look Who's Talking Trilogy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:52, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Xtro Trilogy

Template:The Xtro Trilogy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The House Tetralogy

Template:The House Tetralogy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Maniac Cop Trilogy

Template:The Maniac Cop Trilogy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Terror Toons Duology

Template:The Terror Toons Duology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Waxwork Duology

Template:The Waxwork Duology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Wishmaster Series

Template:The Wishmaster Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Iron Eagle Series

Template:The Iron Eagle Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alice in Wonderland 1931

Unfortunately the film has not been released on DVD. It was the 1933 version that was released on DVD by Universal in March 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.95.84 (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pinhead (Puppet Master)

The article Pinhead (Puppet Master) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable "character" from a B-horror film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelWhy? talk 20:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jester (Puppet Master)

The article Jester (Puppet Master) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable "character" from a B-horror film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelWhy? talk 20:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Torch (Puppet Master)

The article Torch (Puppet Master) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable "character" from a B-horror film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelWhy? talk 20:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blade (Puppet Master)

The article Blade (Puppet Master) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable "character" from a B-horror film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelWhy? talk 21:00, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Looney Tunes Platinum Collection, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Witch Hazel, Ralph Phillips and Page Miss Glory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Looney Tunes Super Stars' Sylvester and Hippety Hopper: Marsupial Mayhem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cat's Paw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Use of derviative works templates

As the creator of {{The Creepshow Trilogy}} and {{The Children of the Corn Series}}, I thought you might be interested in the discussion about the use of derivative works templates in author bio articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Looney Tunes Platinum Collection: Volume 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of 20th Century Fox films (1915–2000) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

]; only the musical score was heard. 1927/28 Academy Award winner, Best Actress Janet Gaynor)
| align="right"| January 31, 1971 || ''[[Countess Dracula''|| <ref name="MGM" group=N>rights now belong to [[Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer|MGM]]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of La Feet's Defeat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Feet's Defeat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Feet's Defeat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Le Pig-Al Patrol for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Pig-Al Patrol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Pig-Al Patrol until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sacre Bleu Cross for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sacre Bleu Cross is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacre Bleu Cross until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Correctonator. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hellraiser, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello Correctonator, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to The Simpsons (season 28) have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 14:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of The Loud House episodes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 06:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Correctonator. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dr. Seuss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Correctonator. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Correctonator. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spitting Image, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lewis MacLeod. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Looney Tunes Platinum Collection

The article Looney Tunes Platinum Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article reads like an advertisement or press release, and has only one source for its 10.03-year history.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Looney Tunes Super Stars' Sylvester and Hippety Hopper: Marsupial Mayhem for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Looney Tunes Super Stars' Sylvester and Hippety Hopper: Marsupial Mayhem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Looney Tunes Super Stars' Sylvester and Hippety Hopper: Marsupial Mayhem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 02:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Looney Tunes Super Stars' Foghorn Leghorn & Friends: Barnyard Bigmouth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Looney Tunes Super Stars' Foghorn Leghorn & Friends: Barnyard Bigmouth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Looney Tunes Super Stars' Foghorn Leghorn & Friends: Barnyard Bigmouth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 12:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Homes For Veterans moved to draftspace; does not appear to pass WP:GNG and WP:NORG. The tone also needs to be adjusted pretty drastically

An article you recently created, Homes For Veterans, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 22:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Homes For Veterans (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Homes For Veterans and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Correctonator! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Homes for Veterans (September 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Subject is not sufficiently notable. No significant coverage exists on this topic in reliable sources.

MaxnaCarta (talk) 12:51, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Homes for Veterans

Hello, Correctonator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Homes for Veterans, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Infomercials (TV specials), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]