User talk:Corporal Punishment

Hello. You have recently left a message at my talk page, stating that I will be banned from editing Wikipedia if I continue to vandalise pages. Believe me when I say I intend no vandalism. I edit many pages, sometimes in ways which are quite minor. I assure you, I make no edit in bad faith. If you could point out to me what in particular you consider vandalism, it may help me to modify my editing behaviour into the future. Thank you and regards, --"User:216.129.211.105"

Vandalism on Santo Domingo

I've removed the warning since you made it clear that this was an honest mistake. Just be more careful in the future. :) LaMenta3 00:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. :) --Corporal Punishment 00:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[Image:Stop_hand.svg|left|30px]] This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 138.130.217.135 00:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC) That wasn't Vandalism, I was trying to revert Vandalsim (I think) and had a problem with navigation popups which I will stop using until I get them right. Please contact LaMenta3 for more Information on this matter. --Corporal Punishment 00:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever gave you that warning went completely out of procedure for placing vandalism warnings, whether or not you were doing anything wrong. That, and the fact that they are an anonymous user, I would say the warning doesn't carry much weight and not to worry about it. Just to educate yourself, though, I'd suggest reading over Wikipedia:Vandalism. LaMenta3 01:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

how did you get that user page like that?

How did you please tell me because I want to borrow that for my user page. But if i cant well then its ok then. Call of duty 07:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent vandalism

This appeared to be vandalism, I accidentally reverted your edit back when I made an edit. I still think it's vandalism though. --JD ^{don't talk} _{email me} 22:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NOOOOT VANDALISM YOU DA** COMMUNIST

what i wrote about the "most influential" romanian (ceausescu 11th) IS TRUE.. dont change it back, you didn;t watch the show, i did..

Hello. You have apparently recently made an addition to my talk page, which involved (I believe) you asserting that I made an addition to your talk page, effectively the addition of the subsection in which this comment is now being posted. I would like to insist that aside from a single instance, I have not, previous to this, made any contributions to your talk page, and I have certainly not made the relevant one. Upon checking the history of your talk page, it appears a User:72.154.8.30 made the contribution of the above text and subsection. Upon checking his talk page, it seems you have contributed a very standard response regarding experimental edits in the page Talk:Nicolae Ceauşescu that have been reverted. Upon examining his edit history, he seems to have made at the time of this writing, twenty-six edits to the page Talk:Nicolae Ceauşescu, five edits to the page Nicolae Ceauşescu, and one edit to your talk page printing there the above text and subsection.

For reference, the information added to my talk page is as follows, minus the subsection heading:

“what i wrote about the "most influential" romanian (ceausescu 11th) IS TRUE.. dont change it back, you didn;t watch the show, i did.. Thanks for that message on my talk page. –Corporal Punishment 03:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)"[reply]

I have not investigated every edit made by User:72.154.8.30. I do not mean to imply conclusions from any of this, but it seems that there has been some misunderstanding. For additional reference, see: User contributions:72.154.8.30 Please advise. --"User:216.129.211.105"

Nevada Highway Patrol

About your last add to this article, is a command and a headquarters the same thing? Vegaswikian 19:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Future Russian Aircraft Carrier"

A page you created, Future Russian Aircraft Carrier, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. eric (mailbox) 04:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]