User talk:CorosanD

This is CorosanD's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michail Boiadjiev (Михаил Бояджиев) (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michail Boiadjiev (Михаил Бояджиев) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 18:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CorosanD! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 18:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michail Boiadjiev (Михаил Бояджиев) (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ZyphorianNexus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michail Boiadjiev (Михаил Бояджиев) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ZyphorianNexus (talk) 17:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment from IRC Live Help

Hi @CorosanD.

We're trying to establish notability first and foremost.

We usually do that through the use of significant coverage in several reliable independent secondary sources.

- Source #1 is a random website homepage.

- Source #2 to #4 are just scans of certificates, which breaks copyright and are primary sources, so do not count towards notability.

- Source #5 is another random website homepage.

- Source #6 is another certificate.

- Source #7 I cannot access, but looks to be a newspaper article, so may be suitable.

- Source #8 another random website homepage.

- Source #9 to #15 I cannot access. They might be newspaper articles? If so they might work as sources

- Source #16 is another random homepage, but it does have a reference, so I am not sure what the reference is referring to.

- Source #17 is a newspaper scan, which breaks copyright, but might work as a source.

- Source #18 is another random homepage.

So out of 18 sources we have 5 that likely break copyright and must be deleted from commons. We do however have at least 1 newspaper source (possibly 6).

If those newspaper sources are each giving significant coverage to Michail with critical commentary/analysis/discussion/debate/review and are not wholly based on interviews, then Michail might meet our notability criteria and may merit an article.

As I can't access those sources, it's difficult to give a good judgment. qcne (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michail Boiadjiev has been accepted

Michail Boiadjiev, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 14:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In case you missed my message on the Live Help Chat about citing sources, @CorosanD:

Yes please do not upload anything copyrighted - just cite them with a full citation so that readers can look the citation up in a library or archive. Wikipedia doesn't require the actual photocopies of the sources, as long as you provide the full citation. In the Visual Editor you can create a "Manual citation" which will let you include lots of fields. The full code for this would probably fall under the cite document template here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Template:Cite_document qcne (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, clear! Thanks for all your support. CorosanD (talk) 18:38, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. :) qcne (talk) 18:43, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]